Not entirely negative, in which alternate reality are you referring to, because it can't be this one?
Can you repeat one positive comment, because I can't remember reading any?
I respect your opinion, I really do, but you seem to see anyone who doesn't agree with it as a sycophant etc.
Read the "Where's Gibson" thread.
That idiot zzzz calls me a hypocrite for me speaking up for Gibson back in April and saying that he had got the big calls right since 2020 (to April 2022)
I wasn't a hypocrite and did explain. Look in particular at post 92, which I will copy here for you:
"I presume I have answered you Roofie. I hope so.
The problem is that people want to either be all one thing, or all another.
Gibson was fantastic 93-06.
He was genuine financial saviour 12-16 with equity injection.
He has been football disaster 06-22, with exception of a 14-16 with Karanka.
20-21 he made decisions to keep us out of League 1 and create an opportunity to go again.
2022 he has messed that opportunity up quite spectacularly.
Overall I want new chapters under different ownership.
It does not stop me recognising the brilliant impact Gibson had in his early chapters and saying so.
It doesn't stop me being grateful for him finally converting some debt to equity in 2012-2016 and keeping us going.
Nor does it stop me being encouraged by things that look like positive change, like Karanka or clearing the decks through 2021-22.
But they don't stop me arriving at my position. He is the problem, not our hope."
I don't expect you to have read everything I have posted (it was you who said you had), but I have been very straight and consistent about Gibson.
I don't care whether you agree with me or not. I realise we diametrically oppose each other re Gibson and his position.
Message boards breed disagreement as both facts and opinions are shared. That's healthy and I don't remotely expect to be in agreement with everyone. I mostly don't engage when I disagree.
You are one of a number of posters who, in my opinion, only ever want to see the best in Gibson and see criticism of him as a knife into the club we all love. It is not.
I used to revere Gibson, but since 2006 I have opened my eyes.
Gibson is not the club, much as he would have us all think he is. The club was here long, long before him and will be long, long after him.