The anti-lockdown brigade appear to be under the misapprehension that lockdown is the only tool in the box to respond to the Covid-19 pandemic and, therefore, feel the need to suggest that the virus isn’t all that dangerous and/or that we’ve all had it by now anyway. The fact of the matter is that those countries which have had to impose strict lockdowns (including UK) are the ones that responded too slowly to start with, mainly due to expecting it to be like a flu pandemic.
The point of lockdown, therefore, has been to get things back under control so that a more appropriate response can be put in place, namely a properly resourced test, track and isolate system. This is how the most successful countries responded from the outset, because they knew that with a SARS-like virus you need to suppress it at all costs, not just let it run through your population.
Incidentally, on the excess deaths debate, last week the ONS released an analysis of causes of death in April (peak month). By far the leading cause was Covid-19, but the second ranked was dementia, which had twice its standardised rate of deaths last month.
People with dementia often live in care homes. where we know there has been a problem with Covid-19, especially last month. I have great difficulty in believing that twice as many people as normal just happened to succumb to dementia in April, so would suggest that it’s most likely these are Covid-19 deaths that have been under-reported.