sherlock
Well-known member
That's Randy. Why did he stop posting by the way?
That’s Randy?
Looks exactly as I’d have expected.
That's Randy. Why did he stop posting by the way?
Not overreacting to one conversation published without context at all….Really disappointing and annoying to read of our Chairman's behaviour and increasing support for Lord Bent and his crew. Not the bloke I thought he was and I won’t be telling other clubs fans how lucky we are to have a local lad as chairman. A local lad who has definitely forgotten where he came from. Dark day for me and leaves a nasty taste in the mouth. Sadly we are so indebted to Gibson we will probably do a Bolton if the fans rebel and call him out but a bloke as a long standing season ticket holder I will always be grateful for for his support for the club but for whom I have lost all respect for.
Not overreacting to one conversation published without context at all….
clearly having a really tough time. I hope he has some good people supporting him. I think there could be a bit of grief transference going on.Reading the rest of the tweets, he seems genuinely unhinged.
I haven’t mentioned that the behaviour was acceptable , but to disown Gibson just because he has effed and blinded in one business meeting just seems hysterical to me as an MFC supporter.What context would make that behaviour acceptable?
You know it’s trueNot overreacting to one conversation published without context at all….
There are a fair few. I am happy for you to have a look yourself if you want but I'm not that bothered by it.Happy for you to highlight where they have…I’m quite sure no one would intentionally do So and would happily set the record straight that this is a discussion on what was reported by private eye and in no way endorsing the veracity of their claims.
I don’t doubt that the quotes are true (PE would be brave to fabricate that) but the conversation is presented as comically one sided in the article.You know it’s true
I don’t doubt that the quotes are true (PE would be brave to fabricate that) but the conversation is presented as comically one sided in the article.
You keep using words like acceptable and excuse, which I haven’t used at all. The language used is clearly contemptuous and disappointing.So I ask again, what context, what other side would make it acceptable?
You keep saying we don’t know the context, so clearly think there is a context that would excuse such terrible behaviour.
What is that context?
You keep using words like acceptable and excuse, which I haven’t used at all. The language used is clearly unprofessional and disappointing.
I’m purely stating that the article is one sided and we do not know the context of the conversation.
Fine. My original comment was aimed at someone else not yourself who stated he had lost all respect for Gibson, which as an MFC supporter I think is an overreaction to one business meeting that has been leaked to the media.My point is the context is therefore irrelevant to concluding Gibson behaved like a d*ck.
Each poster only has to put that prefix once. I see nobody in jeopardy and neither do you.There are a fair few. I am happy for you to have a look yourself if you want but I'm not that bothered by it.
I was just amused by your claim that 'every comment has been prefixed with “if the comments in private eye are true”.
Very Ian Hislopesque. Hence the smiley after my post.
Have a look at posts 54-56 as a small example. No disclaimers there.
There are a fair few. I am happy for you to have a look yourself if you want but I'm not that bothered by it.
Al Pacino saying it to a sweating, worried looking, no name actor you vaguely recognise as maybe being a background character from the US office?What context would make that behaviour acceptable?
I said Gibson can be a knob when he wants to be. I'm sure he can be a good bloke when he wants to be too, I'm certainly not disowning him as our chairman even if he has overstepped the mark with those comments (if). I've called all sorts of people knobs before though, including myself, no one has successfully sued me (yet, though I did try).There are a fair few. I am happy for you to have a look yourself if you want but I'm not that bothered by it.
I was just amused by your claim that 'every comment has been prefixed with “if the comments in private eye are true”.
Very Ian Hislopesque. Hence the smiley after my post.
Have a look at posts 54-56 as a small example. No disclaimers there.
I haven’t mentioned that the behaviour was acceptable , but to disown Gibson just because he has effed and blinded in one business meeting just seems hysterical to me as an MFC supporter.