Your prime minister ladies and gents

I think our resident Brexit correspondents clicked the ignore button on me at the moment, either that or he's refusing to answer the question I posted for him.
More than likely.
Have never and will never vote Tory in my life and I can 100% guarantee that even if Juninho himself became a candidate under the umbrella of the conservatives to run the country.
 
Don't

He wants people to say that. It's something Alexander has carefully cultivated. If peeople are saying he's lying, his inaction has killed people, his corruption has stolen our taxes, then that doesn't look good.

If someone says "look at the hair" He can laugh that off. It's 100% deliberate. He's been spotted intentionally ruffling his hair and messing up his outfit before interviews.
Norman thinks you may have accidently pressed the ignore button on him as you haven't answered his question which was as follows 'This isn't a one-off clip of Boris openly misleading the general public, it was something that was seen throughout his election campaign, what I would like to ask you though is what you saw in him that made you put a tick in his box?'
 
'This isn't a one-off clip of Boris openly misleading the general public, it was something that was seen throughout his election campaign, what I would like to ask you though is what you saw in him that made you put a tick in his box?'

Also who could ever forget him running off and hiding in a walk in fridge? Trust me, from experience they wouldn't be my first choice for a hiding place unless you were absolutely desperate to escape the public eye.
 
'This isn't a one-off clip of Boris openly misleading the general public, it was something that was seen throughout his election campaign, what I would like to ask you though is what you saw in him that made you put a tick in his box?'

Also who could ever forget him running off and hiding in a walk in fridge? Trust me, from experience they wouldn't be my first choice for a hiding place unless you were absolutely desperate to escape the public eye.
Are you on about Boris or Smalltown? :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Would getting an answer to that from ST affect your response to the point being discussed, or are you just point scoring?
No, it wouldn't affect my response which you can see from my previous posts, and I certainly wouldn't say I was point scoring but asking for an answer to a question similar to the way he demanded I answered his. The tone of Smalltowns reply post to me was condescending, to say the least.

Sometimes Smalltown's attitude rubs fellow posters up the wrong way when he tries to take the moral high ground.
 
No, it wouldn't affect my response which you can see from my previous posts, and I certainly wouldn't say I was point scoring but asking for an answer to a question similar to the way he demanded I answered his. The tone of Smalltowns reply post to me was condescending, to say the least.

Sometimes Smalltown's attitude rubs fellow posters up the wrong way when he tries to take the moral high ground.
That’s what tories do, they take the moral high ground when it suits them
 
Would getting an answer to that from ST affect your response to the point being discussed, or are you just point scoring?
This is a good point. I think he's sore because I pointed out his initial few posts were designed specifically to have a pop at me. Even though he agreed with what I was saying. I picked someone else up about this the other day. It's not a great look for them. He can be forgiven though because he eventually returned to the subject. It's just a shame I have to keep steering people back from personal attacks to actually answer the subject
 
This is a good point. I think he's sore because I pointed out his initial few posts were designed specifically to have a pop at me. Even though he agreed with what I was saying. I picked someone else up about this the other day. It's not a great look for them. He can be forgiven though because he eventually returned to the subject. It's just a shame I have to keep steering people back from personal attacks to actually answer the subject
And like a true Tory you still haven't answered the direct question. Much like Mr Johnson in fact.
You can't expect others to answer your questions when you don't answer ones directed back at you.

That's not a good look for you.
 
Can I just say, why do we need a buffoon to tell us to wear masks. If you don’t feel safe in crowds without one, wear one.
The Mask doesn't protect you, it protects those who aren't wearing one but it doesn't stop them giving it to you, even though you are wearing one.
 
Don't

He wants people to say that. It's something Alexander has carefully cultivated. If peeople are saying he's lying, his inaction has killed people, his corruption has stolen our taxes, then that doesn't look good.

If someone says "look at the hair" He can laugh that off. It's 100% deliberate. He's been spotted intentionally ruffling his hair and messing up his outfit before interviews.
I can't recall who it was that sad they met him backstage at some awards about 15 years ago. He turned up late, and ruffled his hair to look disheveled before going on stage and proceeded to tell a story why he was late and looking a mess. Whichever celebrity it was then said they bumped into him backstage again where he did exactly the same thing and told exactly the same story why he was late and looking disheveled.

I might have slightly mullered the story with my recollection, but the sentiment is correct. Yes, it's all an act.
 
This is a good point. I think he's sore because I pointed out his initial few posts were designed specifically to have a pop at me. Even though he agreed with what I was saying. I picked someone else up about this the other day. It's not a great look for them. He can be forgiven though because he eventually returned to the subject. It's just a shame I have to keep steering people back from personal attacks to actually answer the subject
At no point did I have a pop at you other than to tell you the tone of your replies was out of order. It seems many others agreed with what I wrote by the number of 'likes' my reply received.

As for eventually agreeing with you, I never disagreed. I made a statement saying do we need a buffoon to tell us we need to wear a mask. You obviously hadn't read this and demanded I answer your question by stating I was deflecting away from the topic. I explained that I was out with the dogs and would reply.

You have a very poor attitude at times and you need to address it.

Regarding the question I posed, you have shown your true colours on here once again and I don't expect you to answer it.
 
At no point did I have a pop at you other than to tell you the tone of your replies was out of order. It seems many others agreed with what I wrote by the number of 'likes' my reply received.

As for eventually agreeing with you, I never disagreed. I made a statement saying do we need a buffoon to tell us we need to wear a mask. You obviously hadn't read this and demanded I answer your question by stating I was deflecting away from the topic. I explained that I was out with the dogs and would reply.

You have a very poor attitude at times and you need to address it.

Regarding the question I posed, you have shown your true colours on here once again and I don't expect you to answer it.
You seem to be getting angry and missing my point. You say at no point did you disagree with me: this is correct. The Robles I have with this attitude is you first few messages, and subsequent messages on the thread ignored the issue and were used just as a personal attack on me. I know you’re not the only one who does this but this attitude needs to change. You need to be better and reply to subjects and not personality
 
I agree that our Prime Minister is a dangerous entity with no love for the useless eaters that make up the masses.

With that in mind, why did you vote for him @SmallTown?
 
You seem to be getting angry and missing my point. You say at no point did you disagree with me: this is correct. The Robles I have with this attitude is you first few messages, and subsequent messages on the thread ignored the issue and were used just as a personal attack on me. I know you’re not the only one who does this but this attitude needs to change. You need to be better and reply to subjects and not personality
Can you please copy and paste any personal attacks I have made on you?

Other than my reply to Jam, I can't see anything that you could be upset with but sometimes the truth hurts. I have later pulled you to task regarding your attitude towards me and the tone of your replies. I also asked you the question of how you fell for the PM's lies, something you have failed to answer.
 
Can you please copy and paste any personal attacks I have made on you?

Other than my reply to Jam, I can't see anything that you could be upset with but sometimes the truth hurts. I have later pulled you to task regarding your attitude towards me and the tone of your replies. I also asked you the question of how you fell for the PM's lies, something you have failed to answer.
They are there and we’ve gone over this ground so many times. It’s clear for all to see you saw it was me writing the thread and even though you agreed with the content saw fit to just personally attack me instead of addressing it. This behaviour has gone on for too long and I’m going to call you out for it now
 
Back
Top