It was really interesting to hear how Carrick responded to the question about our different shape yesterday. He slightly dismissed that it was a whole lot different to normal - especially with the ball.
I think without the ball it was very much a 3-4-3 (or 5-2-2-1) with Greenwood and Rogers being part of a box midfield ahead of Barlaser and Hackney. Villa love to play centrally so it made perfect sense.
But when we did have periods of possession I felt Rav became more of a right back, Engel and Clarke as centre half's. Bangura played high (as our left back does) on the left with
Izzy high on the right. Greenwood came narrow from the left and Rogers was 10. I think some of the tweaks were quite subtle and very clever. Often just moving a players starting position 10-15 yards.
There were some screenshots somewhere that showed the average positions of our players that seem to back Carrick up that it wasn't quite a drastic change.
I thought we looked very well coached!
I think without the ball it was very much a 3-4-3 (or 5-2-2-1) with Greenwood and Rogers being part of a box midfield ahead of Barlaser and Hackney. Villa love to play centrally so it made perfect sense.
But when we did have periods of possession I felt Rav became more of a right back, Engel and Clarke as centre half's. Bangura played high (as our left back does) on the left with
Izzy high on the right. Greenwood came narrow from the left and Rogers was 10. I think some of the tweaks were quite subtle and very clever. Often just moving a players starting position 10-15 yards.
There were some screenshots somewhere that showed the average positions of our players that seem to back Carrick up that it wasn't quite a drastic change.
I thought we looked very well coached!