you're right, already has because of this caseThink he already has, isn't his massive house in rural Bedfodshire in his wife's name ?
Or do they?Ultimately liars get their comeuppance. It’s why I still have hope that this government gets what is coming to it.
Yaxley-Lennon is a despicable human being and deserves everything he continues to get.
It will be interesting to see if he gets away with such a blatant attempt to avoid paying his "consequences". I imagine this isn't going to be the last time he has to "defend himself" in a court of law.Think he already has, isn't his massive house in rural Bedfodshire in his wife's name ?
I can’t decide which of these the Yax is. Possibly all threerepresenting yourself is one of the real indicators.
It means you are either
b) a person who thinks they are intelligent but is actually too stupid to realise they are stupid.
c) so much of an **** even a defence firm won't take you on.
Yaxley-Lennon is the very worst of this country, a serial law breaking bully, who only got involved in politics when his drug round in Luton was taxed by Asian’s driven from London by the Albanian Mafia.
How a wife beating, drug dealing, police man assaulting, fraud committing football hooligan has any place as a spokesperson for any political entity is baffling, I do suppose as someone who attempted illegal entry into a country on a false passport he has some inside knowledge on immigration and his stand against peadophiles seems noble until one learns that he gave fake alibis to help aide the case of a friend’ who in spite of Robinson’s statements was convicted on several counts of peadophila.
interesting case this one. there seemed to be a fair few testifying that the kid in the case was indeed a bully, hitting a girl with a hockey stick and smashing another kids head off the wall etc. some adults talking about it too. there was a video of locals being questioned about it, not just the stereotype Robinson supporters, but even some Asian elders saying the kid was a bully and attacked younger kids. so I guess the decision just dismisses any witnesses on those things. I wonder how much it was even considered
That’s not to defend Tommy Robinson, he had no place to get involved, although I’m sure I know why he did.
I still think there was more to the case and he may not have been totally wrong about the story, unless we’re just dismissing a fair few and kids locals as total liars, but it certainly wasn’t his place to be involved anyway.
whether he’s right or wrong about what happened, I don’t think it’s wrong to be paying damages for blowing up a story involving children, but then again, so did the newspapers...but they’re hardly a moral compass either.