Xg from WBA game

[anth25]

I know xg is a contentious issue but how on earth can they determine that WBA had a higher xg than us in that game.



Absolute nonsense

 

[weemoby]

It's poppycock, isn't it?

 

[The_Big_Woodowski]

Bloody stats..

Sky have us down as not committing any fouls but WB won 7.

 

[TeaCider]

Must be the late chances.

I expect the blatant foul on Dieng was counted as a chance for them.

 

[Marvanelli]

Because Jed Wallace’s chance was a pretty decent one, whereas our goal was a shot form 20/25 yards.

I agree we fully deserved that win and we were the better team.

But on xG I can understand why they won on that

 

[Colgates_shaving_foam]

It's a load of rubbish, invented by youtubers and podcasters to give them some extra filler for added 'content'.

 

[BoroMart]

Because Jed Wallace’s chance was a pretty decent one, whereas our goal was a shot form 20/25 yards.

I agree we fully deserved that win and we were the better team.

But on xG I can understand why they won on that

We probably had four really good chance. Wonder if there is an error in the data that will corrected later I thought we would about 1.7 - 1.9

 

[Alzi]

Ruined my night that we lost the xG.

 

[Corcaigh_the_Cat]

We had one good chance and McGree put it over, they had the Wallace one and the one that Maja should have scored from with the goal wide open.

 

[anth25]

Not sure Swifts chance was any bigger than Mcgree's or Burgzorg's

 

[The Card Cheat]

Because Jed Wallace’s chance was a pretty decent one, whereas our goal was a shot form 20/25 yards.

I agree we fully deserved that win and we were the better team.

But on xG I can understand why they won on that

But we had..
Azazs saved shot and McGreees openish goal miss.
ELLs header that the keeper made an excellent save from.
Doaks 1 on 1 that their keeper pulled off another good save from.
ELLs header that he headed just wide from the subsequent corner.
Burgzorgs clear cut chance that he hit wide from Borges pass.
And an actual Goal.
How they get an xg of less than 1 from that I’m not sure!

 

[Corcaigh_the_Cat]

Not sure Swifts chance was any bigger than Mcgree's or Burgzorg's

Forgot about the Swift and Burgzorg ones

 

[speckyget]

I'll take it. Outscoring the opposition AND our xG - priceless.

 

[Corcaigh_the_Cat]

But we had..
Azazs saved shot and McGreees openish goal miss.
ELLs header that the keeper made an excellent save from.
Doaks 1 on 1 that their keeper pulled off another good save from.
ELLs header that he headed just wide from the subsequent corner.
Burgzorgs clear cut chance that he hit wide from Borges pass.
And an actual Goal.
How they get an xg of less than 1 from that I’m not sure!

The goal wouldn't have been in amongst the chances, otherwise just about every time someone received a ball around the box would count as one. It was a beautiful finish.

 

[weemoby]

Ruined my night that we lost the xG.

Thoughts and prayers, Hun, thoughts and prayers

 

[atypical_boro]

Can’t wait to see all these xG bonus points rolling in.

 

[Corcaigh_the_Cat]

I'll take it. Outscoring the opposition AND our xG - priceless.

You win nothing with Xg. It's g that counts.

 

[atypical_boro]

The goal wouldn't have been in amongst the chances, otherwise just about every time someone received a ball around the box would count as one. It was a beautiful finish.

I said to my wife it couldn’t have been a better shot from there, it was absolute perfection.

 

[Diego]

Ruined my night that we lost the xG.

Not sure how I will recover from this

 

[Red n White Dreamer]

Feels like a defeat now.