Windrush Report

Lefty

Well-known member
'Institutional racism'

“institutional ignorance and thoughtlessness towards the issue of race”

In a scathing report on the way British citizens were wrongly deported, dismissed from their jobs and deprived of services such as NHS care, the department is blamed for operating a “culture of disbelief and carelessness”.

The review following on the consequences of the Home Office’s “hostile environment” policy, says the scandal was “foreseeable and avoidable”. It says warning signs of problems caused by the immigration policy – such as “racially insensitive” billboards telling people to “go home or face arrest” – were ignored.
There was a tendency to blame individuals caught up in the immigration regulations, the report says. They found themselves criticised for failing to obtain evidence of their status, even though when they tried to do so they were not provided with the right documentation.

The report’s author, Wendy Williams, an inspector of constabulary, said at its launch: “The Windrush generation has been poorly served by this country, a country to which they contributed so much and in which they had every right to make their lives. The many stories of injustice and hardships are heartbreaking, with jobs lost, lives uprooted and untold damage done to so many individuals and families.”

Williams said she met about 800 people, and many of the interviews had been extremely upsetting. She said one man had been in tears when he told her how he had lost his job and his home “in tragic circumstances”. He told her: “I can’t believe I have been treated like this by my beloved England.”

Williams said: “There were a number of examples that were equally as upsetting. There was an overwhelming sense of bewilderment. They couldn’t understand how this had been allowed to happen.”

The 275-page report says the roots of the problem can be traced back to racially motivated legislation dating back to the 1960s, 70s and 80s.

The report notes that the Home Office does not have a large black and minority-ethnic workforce at senior level. “I think it is unfortunate that most of the policymakers were white and most of the people involved were black,” a senior official is quoted as saying in the report.

Some were wrongly deported to countries they had left as children half a century earlier, and others were mistakenly detained in immigration detention centres. Many were sacked by employers who were worried that they faced £20,000 fines for hiring people without the correct documentation. Some were then denied benefits, leaving them destitute. Many were made homeless, denied NHS treatment and prevented from travelling.

The scandal led to the resignation in April 2018 of the then home secretary Amber Rudd and put Theresa May’s drive to create a “really hostile environment for illegal migration” under the spotlight.
 
'Institutional racism'

“institutional ignorance and thoughtlessness towards the issue of race”

In a scathing report on the way British citizens were wrongly deported, dismissed from their jobs and deprived of services such as NHS care, the department is blamed for operating a “culture of disbelief and carelessness”.

The review following on the consequences of the Home Office’s “hostile environment” policy, says the scandal was “foreseeable and avoidable”. It says warning signs of problems caused by the immigration policy – such as “racially insensitive” billboards telling people to “go home or face arrest” – were ignored.
There was a tendency to blame individuals caught up in the immigration regulations, the report says. They found themselves criticised for failing to obtain evidence of their status, even though when they tried to do so they were not provided with the right documentation.

The report’s author, Wendy Williams, an inspector of constabulary, said at its launch: “The Windrush generation has been poorly served by this country, a country to which they contributed so much and in which they had every right to make their lives. The many stories of injustice and hardships are heartbreaking, with jobs lost, lives uprooted and untold damage done to so many individuals and families.”

Williams said she met about 800 people, and many of the interviews had been extremely upsetting. She said one man had been in tears when he told her how he had lost his job and his home “in tragic circumstances”. He told her: “I can’t believe I have been treated like this by my beloved England.”

Williams said: “There were a number of examples that were equally as upsetting. There was an overwhelming sense of bewilderment. They couldn’t understand how this had been allowed to happen.”

The 275-page report says the roots of the problem can be traced back to racially motivated legislation dating back to the 1960s, 70s and 80s.

The report notes that the Home Office does not have a large black and minority-ethnic workforce at senior level. “I think it is unfortunate that most of the policymakers were white and most of the people involved were black,” a senior official is quoted as saying in the report.

Some were wrongly deported to countries they had left as children half a century earlier, and others were mistakenly detained in immigration detention centres. Many were sacked by employers who were worried that they faced £20,000 fines for hiring people without the correct documentation. Some were then denied benefits, leaving them destitute. Many were made homeless, denied NHS treatment and prevented from travelling.

The scandal led to the resignation in April 2018 of the then home secretary Amber Rudd and put Theresa May’s drive to create a “really hostile environment for illegal migration” under the spotlight.


A great time to bury bad news
Next week - Russian interference in elections
 
And then the country voted them back in. Everyone in the UK should be ashamed but sadly there are many more of the "send 'em all back" brigade still around than I ever imagined.

Indeed.

I've followed a lot of EU citizens here and UK citizens abroad and some of their support groups and the experiences and treatment of many EU citizens has had many similar echoes of this in the last four years. It's awful and shameful.
 
Does Sir Philip get a mention. The most senior civil service in that department through this scandal?
 
Cooper this is your party who did this, I'd keep quiet if I were you.

Why I think it’s important the people in this department. The most senior are held to account. That includes civil servants.
 
He arrived there 5 years after the hostile environment was instigated. By 2017 when he arrived there were injustices reported in the Guardian, who carried on for another 15 months before it got to parliament. The writing on the wall was there to be seen so you're right about his responsibility (as the report highlights) but this was government policy and it's ministers not acknowledging the extent of the injustice shows their allegiance to the policy.
 
Why I think it’s important the people in this department. The most senior are held to account. That includes civil servants.

The decision to destroy the landing cards was taken in June 2009 (when Allan Johnson was Home Secretary under the last Labour Government) by the Border Agency, for admin/data protection reasons. Johnson played no part in the decision and wasn't even made aware of it.

In May 2010 Theresa May became Home Secretary and it wasn't until October 2010 that the 2009 decision was implemented and the landing cards were actually destroyed.

In May 2012 Theresa May declared “the aim is to create here in Britain a really hostile environment for illegal migration.” For the next two years measures were introduced to put pressure on immigrants and the Immigration Act 2014 brought in new powers to help the Home Office and other government agencies to make life difficult for illegal migrants.

From 2013 onwards the Home Office received warnings that many Windrush generation residents were being treated as illegal immigrants and that older Caribbean born people were being targeted. The Refugee and Migrant Centre in Wolverhampton said their caseworkers were seeing hundreds of people receiving Capita letters telling them that they had no right to be in the UK, some of whom were told to arrange to leave the UK at once. Roughly half the letters went to people who already had leave to remain or were in the process of formalising their immigration status. Caseworkers had warned the Home Office directly and also through local MP's of these cases since 2013.

In July Theresa May became PM and Amber Rudd became Home Secretary. From this point Theresa May was intent on delivering a Brexit for people for whom immigration had been a prime motivation according to polls, survey's and word clouds composed from answers generally given. This was reflected in her 'red lines' on our future relationship with the EU.

Philip Rutnam moved from the Dept of Transport under Chris Grayling (no wonder he took the job) to the Home Office in April 2017.

So.....why do you think Rutnam should be singled out?
 
Because he was the most senior civil servant in that department. Amber Rudd was fed incorrect information by him and went before a select committee with it. It was also suggested senior civil servants purposely sent incorrect information to the Home Secretary. I didn’t say he should be singled out but his role shouldn’t be under played.
 
Give over, if this was about who was responsible for stitching up a Home Secretary in front of a select committee then you might have a point, but it really isn't about that.

Considering you were a labour supporter for so long, it's been quite a turnaround. Must have been a helluva blow to the head. It's like any post critical of the Tories is like a tiny rubber hammer to your knee tendon.
 
I haven’t read the report and bear seems to indicate that the report does highlight him. My point really is if he hadn’t quit recently would you be happy with him still being there after this report? I believe he should have gone when Rudd went. It was clear then the home office needed a clear out

just to add I haven’t defended the government at all over this. Just highlighting that everyone should be accountable
 
The policy was the will of Tory Ministers, not civil servants. It ran from 2012 to 2018. Yet you picked on the civil servant who came in for the last quarter of it's implementation and long after most of the damage.

It's hard to conclude it's not because you dislike him for embarrassing Priti recently.
 
Well I do regard him as someone who needed cleaning out of there yes. I would disagree on the embarrassing though but we ain’t gonna agree on that part
 
What I will never understand about this case is how these people managed to get through life undocumented?
It’s easy to blame the gvt but surely the individuals have some ownership of the issue. It’s not believable that they were unawares that they were flying under the radar (some purposefully)

some of the things they would need in life:

passport , driving licence . National insurance card, proof of address, hmrc tax codes, drrecords, employment history.
 
Institutional is the operative word. That comes from the top. Government ministers. The civil servants were only following orders, but they should have questioned the injustices that were taking place. Individuals are not singled out but statements like "the Home Office demonstrated “institutional ignorance and thoughtlessness towards the issue of race”
 
What I will never understand about this case is how these people managed to get through life undocumented?
It’s easy to blame the gvt but surely the individuals have some ownership of the issue. It’s not believable that they were unawares that they were flying under the radar (some purposefully)

some of the things they would need in life:

passport , driving licence . National insurance card, proof of address, hmrc tax codes, drrecords, employment history.
That wasn't sufficient. So people lost their jobs they'd been doing for 15 years. Nothing under the radar.

the Home Office is blamed for operating a “culture of disbelief and carelessness”. It concludes that the failings are “consistent with some elements of the definition of institutional racism”.

There was a tendency to blame individuals caught up in the immigration regulations, the report says. They found themselves criticised for failing to obtain evidence of their status, even though when they tried to do so they were not provided with the right documentation.
 
Back
Top