Is it though. I told you at the beginning of the thread that I personally know two people who work there who have both told me the reports in the paper are correct and that the official statement is wrong.
The restaurants are franchised are they not?
You claim my friend doesn't know the actual detaila, you don't even know who she is or who she works for or how she knows these details. Let's just say hospitality circles ar close circles.
Also someone earlier in the thread mentioned a connection with a place in Stokesley, I know what that place is now and I'm not at all surprised they would be linked to this fella.
I don't know, is it? What level are the staff you know that work there, I assume they're not one of the many directors? Which one do they work for, seemingly there's quite a few.
I'm intrigued by this like
I sort of want you to be right by the way, but more so I want the staff to have a job in 6 months.
My point is, I just don't think the detail is anywhere near the public domain, I don't even think the staff will know, to be honest, I bet the accountants don't know in full and even the directors don't even know fully, especially if it's across multiple businesses and they have other interests.
If they're franchised, then why is one guy who is seemingly a minor shareholder on the one that had the majority of the cash (albeit 1.5 years ago) being asked to bail them all out?
Why would your friend in a restaurant you won't name, at a level you won't describe, which is seemingly a competitor, know everything? I appreciate people talk, but things also get exaggerated, misunderstood, assumed etc.
Jees, there are directors of some companies that I'm heavily involved, that don't know as much as me about their own business, and they have more shares than me, if they don't know, the staff certainly don't know, and they all work alongside each other!!
What people claim they know, what you assume they know and what the facts are, are very different things.