I said he should probably be our starter but I'm basing it on the assumption he is better than what we've seen of him so far (which is basically nothing) and the fact that what we are seeing from the players we have seen isn't good enough.Yes I’m puzzled by these comments about OBrien as well. What evidence commits people to say he should be our starter midfielder ahead of Barlaser and Howson? Barlaser hasn’t let us down , does the simple things very well and works hard. Keeps his place for me.
Barlaser hasn't let us down but if we want promotion then you need more than "hasn't let us down". You need controls the game, makes a difference and does the defensive side of things and I don't think he has, or will ever have, that fully rounded game. It is that reason why I think he is adequate back-up but if he's first choice then it's a sign of us being a poor team.