Tim Parker, National Trust chairman

Used to work and be a consultant for them. There are some great people who work there and support the organisation.
This guy is hardly a man of the people, he has a history of restructuring companies to make them profitable often slashing the workforce and off-shoring manufacturing.
The NT has been hit hard over the last year at a time when it could have offered a lifeline with the public and being able to get outdoors. There has been a massive restructure with many people losing their jobs.
The core purpose of the charity is a conservation charity, protecting countryside and historic buildings. It would be true to say that a lot of projects lost this focus and wasted lots of money running down blind alleys in an attempt to be inclusive.
 
The no confidence motion hasn't happened, it would have been at the NT annual General meeting.

He was a pretty controversial chairman, he sacked a lot of staff and presided over a lot of bizarre stuff - like his statements on BLM. I doubt it is fair to lay this at the government's door.
 
Forced to resign for actually looking into where the nation's wealthy obtained their money.

Less than 1% of the membership in favour but pushed through by the trust under pressure from government ministers.

Another shining example of our national leadership and their infatuation with dishonesty.
He should he gone after the NTs support for the Stonehenge monstrosity, & it’s appalling treatment of its tenant farmers in Cumbria. Plenty of reasons s to give him the bullet other than this issue
 
He should he gone after the NTs support for the Stonehenge monstrosity, & it’s appalling treatment of its tenant farmers in Cumbria. Plenty of reasons s to give him the bullet other than this issue
Absolutely, but it was this issue that did the trick. Not his previous misdemeanours.
 
They went too woke for most of their membership, examples volunteer stewards at some locations pushed very hard to wear rainbow badges (to me it should be a genuine choice), second example they dropped the word Easter from their chocolate trials where children hunt Easter eggs, because it meant be offensive to non-christians.

Slavery was awful and totally wrong, but we were talking about pre-1834 where many people of all skin colours types were badly exploited, orphans were enslaved in this country till they were 21 (if they made it), people were transported to Australia and treated as slaves for 7 years for belonging to a trade union, people were cleared off land and transported in Ireland and Scotland to Canada in Coffin Ships, children worked in mines and up chimneys. A lot of wealthy people (such as the Royal Family at the time) benefitted from all this and invested that wealth in country houses and estates. I don't think this should be hidden away, especially if it is particularly pertinent to a NT Property, neither should it dominate the visitor experience. To be honest I never saw this go over the top, if anything I felt the NT downplayed it at times. For example at Trangwainton Gardens in Cornwall they was no mention of slavery (OK in 2003) the estate and gardens was developed by the Tate & Lyle family - 200 years ago whose money came from West Indian sugar.

I was in favour of modernising parts of the NT when I was a member, like stopping fox hunting on NT land, developing urban locations like the back to back houses in Birmingham. 90% of what they did I thought they did well. Sorry I don't know the details about the farmers in Cumbria.
 
They went too woke... they dropped the word Easter from their chocolate trials where children hunt Easter eggs, because it meant be offensive to non-christians.
They didn't, marketing gurus swapped Easter for Cadbury.

The replacement of the word Easter from "Easter Egg Hunt", despite it being prominently displayed on the marketing bumpf, was then whipped up into a moral panic by the media & the Conservative Party in the run up 2017 General Election.

1622115924900.png
 
Ref Easter - I was going on what I had read in the Media. I haven't visited a NT Property since late 2018.

The Rainbow badges at a location in rural Norfolk I have read stories about in a few places. Myself I would wear one, but I know some people are not so liberal. I like to treat and respect people as equal individuals with differing personalities and interests and lives and that make world more interesting. I do believe stewards should under no pressure to wear a badge except a plain name and role badge.
 
According to reports the membership weren't in favour of his departure, it was the trustees pushed by Tories.

A motion of no confidence supported by less than 1% of the membership.
 
The Easter Egg thing happened due to a ridiculous decision between Cadburys and the NT. Cadburys donated the eggs to the NT and wanted some additional promotional opportunities. At the same time the NT were questioning why they didnt appeal to other parts of the population, rather than the typical pensioners and empty nesters. A lot of marketing was then aimed at families and ethnic minorities. It was then decided that they wouldnt make Easter having a religious theme, something they later regretted. Incidentally Easter used to see the biggest number of visitors to the properties, giving a headache to the property staff and overrunning cafes etc.

The rainbow situation resulted from some research from a focus group. This said that they should tell more local stories about the inhabitants of the properties. There was one property that had a very flamboyant homosexual resident. All properties were then instructed to research any links that they may have had to LGBTQ. Again they went back to a focus group made up of gay people belonging to one of the campaign groups, who agreed that this should be promoted. Unfortunately they then went ahead and forced everyone to support diversity. A lot of people felt very awkward about this, not only the ones who didnt support diversity but also ones who did support diversity. I have a son who is LGBTQ, who strongly believes in living his life without the need to promote the fact that he is both trans and gay. He felt that this campaign made him some sort of peep show.

Fox hunting, the NT sit on the fence massively. They do support country sports a massive number of benefactors are country folk who believe in hunting. However a lot of members are from urban areas and are anti hunting. Therefore at best hunting is not discussed publicly.

I dont know how you try to modernise the NT.
The membership base is predominately 55+, white and lives in the South East.
They do attract young families when the children are young, but lose these when they become teenagers.
Some of the properties are very interesting, but many are second rate attractions and do not appeal to none members.
The NT will never become a theme park, as this is outside of their charitable status.
Most of the people who visit, do so because they are mixing with people like themselves. To change that would risk alienating the people who support them.
The crunch points for visiting i.e. weekends, bank holidays in the summer creates crunch points when the properties become overwhelmed and cant cope. They need to promote visiting on weekdays, so pensioners and Mums with kids (not at school).

It should continue to do what it does well and not alienate the people who support the charity
 
Back
Top