SmallTown
Well-known member
Agreed. I often wonder why they don'tI agree, but surely the referee is the person best placed to apply them? It's not like the cards are stacked against them, they literally hold all of them.
Agreed. I often wonder why they don'tI agree, but surely the referee is the person best placed to apply them? It's not like the cards are stacked against them, they literally hold all of them.
This is wrong, just wrong. Harranging an official should be a no no in any sportRemember the Luton game a couple of years ago? We forced the ref and linesman to have a conversation about James Collins' penalty, and subsequently disallow it, by arguing vehemently about it. I know that's a rarity, but we never would've got the decision if we hadn't protested so strongly. Shame the same tactic hasn't worked with all the other times officials have made game-ruining decisions.
All of them absolutely spot on.
Moving free kicks forward was in place for a season or two not so long ago, you may recall. If the defending team didn't retreat 10 yards then the ref moved the free kick forward 10 yards. I thought it was a great rule but TPTB decided otherwise and binned it,
This is wrong, just wrong. Harranging an official should be a no no in any sport
Every sport with human referees will suffer errors. Guess what, players make errors too. Arenyou seriously suggesting harrasing officials is a good thing? That's crazyIn an ideal world where officials don't (or, with the help of technology, can't) make egregious and result-defining errors with significant consequences, eg Clattenburg costing Hignett his job, I'd agree.
Sin bins have been in use since the IFAB authorised them back in 2017 (although not for the top professional levels).Sin bin is the only one I'd support.
Except that a bunch of them are not "new rules" at all - they're just a re-stating of existing laws. Or a rehashing of older ideas that were already tried and discarded before.All of them absolutely spot on.