Mother and her 3 year old daughter have life changing injuries. Other people including her 8 year old daughter covered in a corrosive substance. The suspect was convicted of sex offences in 2018 then granted asylum in 2021/2022.
Mother and her 3 year old daughter have life changing injuries. Other people including her 8 year old daughter covered in a corrosive substance. The suspect was convicted of sex offences in 2018 then granted asylum in 2021/2022.
Yeah exactly. Critical thinking out of the window as usual for easily influenced. Anger will be focused in the wrong place again, when it should be focused on this F***ing government.Media has gone into overdrive with the "asylum seeker" narrative......not a dangerous psychopathic c*nt has done this appalling act to a mother and child. Yes media, there are victims in this, actual people with life changing injuries.
The Tories will be rubbing their filthy racist hands together with this incident, plays right into their hands that "they are ALL wrong 'uns" party line.
But didn't the Home Office, under their watch, grant him asylum .........
Backlash for all of this could be huge
I think we definitely need stronger/stricter immigration/asylum controls as a whole and especially for those with a criminal record. I wouldn't go zero tolerance but 100% we need a stronger stance.What’s the answer! Are you advocating stricter asylum controls? No entry for anyone with a criminal record? Certain types of criminal record? Zero tolerance approach?
No thought that said person could have been rehabilitated? Such as a priest supporting the application?
All well and good criticising but what would your approach be? What policy would you like to see government of the day implement?
For one, not allowing something as ridiculous as new found belief in an all-powerful being like Santa Claus or God to have any bearing on an asylum application for a sex offender.What’s the answer! Are you advocating stricter asylum controls? No entry for anyone with a criminal record? Certain types of criminal record? Zero tolerance approach?
No thought that said person could have been rehabilitated? Such as a priest supporting the application?
All well and good criticising but what would your approach be? What policy would you like to see government of the day implement?
I agree but it is political really, everything now has a political slant in this current climate, whether it is just points scoring or trying to come up with some credible solutions, so many parts of our political system do not align to result in a sustainable solution. What one side says is right the other says is wrong so we end up nowhere.Bit all over the place this thread.
Accusing people of focusing their anger on the perpetrator instead of thinking about the victims in one breath, then focusing their own anger on the government in the next.
Claiming the media are obsessed with the asylum seeking status of the attacker whilst also calling it shameful that the government allows asylum seekers like him to be out and about. Isn't that basically doing the same thing?
Some incidents are best not to be used for political point scoring.
My answer would be to refuse someone with a conviction for Sexual Abuse asylum.What’s the answer! Are you advocating stricter asylum controls? No entry for anyone with a criminal record? Certain types of criminal record? Zero tolerance approach?
No thought that said person could have been rehabilitated? Such as a priest supporting the application?
All well and good criticising but what would your approach be? What policy would you like to see government of the day implement?
Rwanda will solve nothing (200 people a year out of 50,000 plus refugees a year) it's a side show. An expensive white elephant that will do nothing to solve any of the issues the Tories have created in our immigration and asylum system.he conned the system as an asylum seeker - that’s exactly why we should send them to Rwanda
or, like most attacks on women - he was a nasty bloke like many of the other white, black, policemen, pop stars, et al