The faster Dieng is fit, the better.

Big_Nothing

Big_Nothing

Well-known member
It goes without saying but we’re not in a position where the keeper can keep getting gubbed at his near post/centre of his goal.

There was question marks before we signed him. Absolutely okay as a stand in and some of his shot stopping and eccentric behaviour has been great but the ball goes through him.

It isn’t good enough.
 
Expat Smoggie said:
Same gaff as the Mackem game. I thought though we just allowed them to shoot, but Glover, oh dear.
Click to expand...
It’s not just these games. Go back to when we signed him and commentary from other fans, a number said that he’s accomplished in some areas but the ball goes through him.

There’s so long you can get away with it before the analysts at other clubs make players aware of these things and a vulnerability is exploited.

One or two others guilty of the same mistake on repeat as well but when it’s the keeper, it’s not one you can afford.

Consistency in a basic level of shot stopping is the bare minimum.
 
If you've got a good keeper in this league you've got half a chance. If you've got one who lets in crap like that, you've got no chance.
 
Dieng concedes a lot of goals .Glover is not good enough .
Maybe the answer is with our loaned out keepers?
Controversial?
I don't rate Dieng , there you go . Posers like Pickford , who dive around looking athletic , but concede more than most . Like Joe Clumsey .
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top