Agree.Will be interesting to see if Ayling tucks into RCB and Jones goes to RWB to keep the same shape or whether he reverts to 4-2-3-1 with Ayling at RB and Jones at RF.
My preference would be Ayling to RCB and stay 3 at the back.
Maybe. But it will be very different when we don't.Not really any difference between Ayling RB/ Jones RW, and Ayling RCB / Jones RWB
It’ll be exactly the same either way when we have the ball
That's what I would say I'd been playing the wrong formation for weeks on end as well. It's not a coincidence we've stopped being caught out down our flanks since we changed it..You’re talking about two or three players changing their starting position by about 10 yards though
As Sir Michael always says, people place too much importance on putting labels on “formations”
Agree, but we aren’t one of the best teams unfortunatelyI’ve seen Guardiola describe formations as meaningless a few times. The best teams change and adapt constantly depending on any number of factors. These days if you stick to a rigid shape you get broken down and punished.
I think this is what he will do because jones will offer something totally different in that position RWB and we might surrender some possession but lure them in and be devastating on the break hopefully . Come on Boro. Good buzz in the groundWill be interesting to see if Ayling tucks into RCB and Jones goes to RWB to keep the same shape or whether he reverts to 4-2-3-1 with Ayling at RB and Jones at RF.
My preference would be Ayling to RCB and stay 3 at the back.
He said it when we were winning as well tbf!
I’ve seen Guardiola describe formations as meaningless a few times
Of course there’s a difference but if the shape changes in different phases of play, why is it only one of the shapes that we say is the formation? The only reason is that it’s an easy way to picture where the players are lined up when kicking off. There can be a world of difference between teams playing the same formation so it doesn’t really describe the way a team will play beyond this.It's just guff though. If formations or shape didn't matter then they would just read 11 names out and not tell them where they play.
What they are trying to say is it's not as simple as just playing a rigid 4-4-2 or whatever formation they play. But it's more fluid and the shape can change through different phases. There's still a clear difference between our 4-2-3-1 formation and our 5-2-2-1 or whatever you want to call it.