TheLodger
Well-known member
I know Neil well and he's not one to just walk away, talk to him and he will be your friend, and that's not a political statement.
Buildings are expensive to keep and older they are more expensive just keeping them at the status quo are. I'll refer you back to the Crown, forget about the mess and why the council own it, but look at the report at keeping it.
£5.5m will need to be spent on it to bring it up to a standard where it can be used, £1m more for it to be used for leisure.
I read all day and every day residents complaining about old buildings being demolished, usually aimed at the council or the likes, even if the council don't own the buildings and in them days rarely did. People love history, but no one wants to pay for it.
Buildings are expensive to keep and older they are more expensive just keeping them at the status quo are. I'll refer you back to the Crown, forget about the mess and why the council own it, but look at the report at keeping it.
£5.5m will need to be spent on it to bring it up to a standard where it can be used, £1m more for it to be used for leisure.
I read all day and every day residents complaining about old buildings being demolished, usually aimed at the council or the likes, even if the council don't own the buildings and in them days rarely did. People love history, but no one wants to pay for it.