Not sure about that.
I reckon I could have set off from Northumberland and got to the ball before Steffen.
That’s by the end of the sequence. Stewart clearly had him on toast if he wasn’t pulling him. It would more likely to be extended due to frivolous appeal, unless they took pity as it was never a penalty.Wasn't a clear-cut goal scoring opportunity for me.
Ross dived when he realised he wouldn't get to the ball before Steffen
It’s a blatant red card, he was pulling him which prevented Stewart leaving him for dead and getting to the ball. It wouldn’t surprise me if it was overturned.
You see that go unpunished in every game.It’s a blatant red card, he was pulling him which prevented Stewart leaving him for dead and getting to the ball. It wouldn’t surprise me if it was overturned.
It’s a blatant red card, he was pulling him which prevented Stewart leaving him for dead and getting to the ball. It wouldn’t surprise me if it was overturned.
I don’t think he was pulling him, Stewarts arm is out to stop Fry getting in front of him, Fry moves his hand out of the way.. then no contact legs collapse at the line and Stewart wins the penna. In real time on the tele it looked exactly what happened to.It’s a blatant red card, he was pulling him which prevented Stewart leaving him for dead and getting to the ball. It wouldn’t surprise me if it was overturned.
The difference between people who have watched football and people who have played football.I really can't believe people don't think it should be overturned.
Seeing comments like 'clear red' and 'last man'.
It's not a foul. He doesn't pull him over, trip him, push him over, drag him to the ground.. I don't see where the foul is at all.
Isn't it funny that even with multiple angles available people still don't agree.
VAR in the Prem is used far too much, when it can still be so subjective. It should be used for absolute HOWLERS from the ref that somehow they've missed.. not subjective calls.