Say and think what you like about Piers Morgan......

indeedido said:
Hats off for the most presumptuous, arrogant post of the year.
And I think many people would have far higher regard for the couple if they hadn't wanted to have their cake and eat it.
If they blend in with the other "celebrities" out there in California, then fine, but don't ride on the royal ticket to maintain that celebrity.
They will disappear like the non-entities they are.

Morgan is not my champion and has me reaching for the remote control, but I think he is spot on in this instance for calling this grasping pair of "victims" out. If you want your quiet, ordinary life, stop F***ing shouting.
Click to expand...


What royal ticket are they riding on, he was born into it, he can't help it, he can't erase his history.

I've put the challenge out to tell me with precise examples why Meghan and Harry are bad, accept the challenge or continue to be one of the royal cap doffing dullards.

What exactly is 'blending in with other celerities', I mean celebrities don't blend in, they stand out, that's what celebrity is! You have proven my point about the intelligence of the average person with that nonsense.
 
indeedido said:
The point is that every other person who lives a celebrity lifestyle is subject to the exact same media scrutiny that they are so appalled by.Markle was pretty much a nonentity launched into major celebrity status by marrying a British senior royal. Suck it up. I have mates who have done far more in Harry's career than he ever has and don't have his opportunity provided by birth.
They can't have their cake and eat it.
Click to expand...
Why should they just suck it up, we shouldnt be accepting that this is the way that the media behave. Whatever your opinion on any celebrity they deserve a private life, to suggest anything different to this is just completely wrong.

Can you give me a single reason why the media should have access to anyone's private life?
 
I cannot tolerate the man. Not sure why he is given so much coverage in the media. It only inflates his enormous ego all the more. I have liked some of his interviews recently when he has put people on the spot, I admit. He tries to be holier than thou, but we know he doesn't always practice what he preaches. Certainly not looking at his past record. He made disparaging remarks years ago about 'Boro when talking about his beloved Arsenal who we were playing, and I think that has stuck with me. UTB.
 
JM14 said:
Do you think its possible they want to maintain this celebrity lifestyle and use the media to their advantage, like every other person in that position does, without every single aspect of their private lives being scrutinised and on the front of newspapers every day. Is that really too much to ask?

Couldnt give a **** about the royals personally, but I think the media in this country is absolutely toxic. People have the right to privacy and this should be respected for every single person regardless of who they are.
Click to expand...
The big issue is that Harry refused to play the game, be a good royal, marry a white half cousin, cut ribbons, promote the brand, be bland, pretend to do a job rather than actually do it.

For this he has been attacked. His wife, I can't see anything she has ever done that is truly nasty to anyone, but there are millions that think she is the devil. It's brainwashing of the highest order. They've stopped taking public money, they've rejected the concept that they are gods anointed representatives entitled to rule over the great unwashed. That seems a pretty honourable stance and a brave one because they knew the royal machine would turn on them. The last year of 'go away and think about it' was a game from the royal family, trying to stick and carrot them into making a different decision. It didn't work because they have their own minds.

I often hear from sycophants how it must be hard being a royal, born into service for your country, never having a normal life, living in a goldfish bowl. Well if it's a tough gig and they want something different, that should be their choice, the kind of 'royal prerogative' I can get on with, the choice to say stuff this nonsense.
 
if they went quietly i don't think anyone would mind at all but its the courting publicity, preaching about morality and sustainability from a ridiculously privileged place which is the big issue to me. I am staunch republican its not them vs the monarchy which is the issue, its a rich couple who got there through privilege rather than endeavour telling the world you must change whilst they drive back in their Chelsea tractor to the Santa Barbara mansion. Megan whilst in Africa in front of the poorest children having the audacity to moan about her personal suffering, you couldn't make it up. They are sanctimonious hypocrites who crave media attention and then cry when they get it.
 
Foggysfplandiet3 said:
And yet plenty of people on here care enough about the working royals that they want them abolished.,
Click to expand...

That's a question of constitutional importance and national identity, which one would think - after the last 5 years of Brexit wars - most would consider worthwhile.

So it's not really the same thing.
 
BoroMart said:
They've largely been quiet for a year, other than a few charity things they do....the press still hounded them.
Click to expand...
You've accused me of being stupid like the majority of people in Britain so you say.
All I can think is you have lost your senses if you think they've largely been quiet for a year.
 
indeedido said:
You've accused me of being stupid like the majority of people in Britain so you say.
All I can think is you have lost your senses if you think they've largely been quiet for a year.
Click to expand...
So what have they done that is so evil and so 'look at me'?
 
BoroMart said:
What royal ticket are they riding on, he was born into it, he can't help it, he can't erase his history.

I've put the challenge out to tell me with precise examples why Meghan and Harry are bad, accept the challenge or continue to be one of the royal cap doffing dullards.

What exactly is 'blending in with other celerities', I mean celebrities don't blend in, they stand out, that's what celebrity is! You have proven my point about the intelligence of the average person with that nonsense.
Click to expand...
It is why I put "celebrities". Read it again and comprehend.
 
JM14 said:
Why should they just suck it up, we shouldnt be accepting that this is the way that the media behave. Whatever your opinion on any celebrity they deserve a private life, to suggest anything different to this is just completely wrong.

Can you give me a single reason why the media should have access to anyone's private life?
Click to expand...
When you open your private life to said media, you've lost control over what they consider acceptable access. The tabloid media and the gossip mag media clearly see you as fair game.
 
I think that if you can't see the difference between the way in which the media has treated Harry and more precisely Meghan (irrespective of your view on the Royal Family more generally) and more 'run of the mill' celebrities then you have either not been paying attention of you have a blind spot. Frankly the way in which the media has treated Meghan is shameful. She isn't the only victim by any means but if you think she has been dealt with in the same way as Kate Middleton then you're crackers.
 
Adi_Dem said:
I think that if you can't see the difference between the way in which the media has treated Harry and more precisely Meghan (irrespective of your view on the Royal Family more generally) and more 'run of the mill' celebrities then you have either not been paying attention of you have a blind spot. Frankly the way in which the media has treated Meghan is shameful. She isn't the only victim by any means but if you think she has been dealt with in the same way as Kate Middleton then you're crackers.
Click to expand...
Of course she has been treated differently to Kate Middleton; she has acted and behaved very differently. If you can't see that then you are the one that is crackers Adi.
 
indeedido said:
Of course she has been treated differently to Kate Middleton; she has acted and behaved very differently. If you can't see that then you are the one that is crackers Adi.
Click to expand...

Tell me the ways in which she has behaved differently. And then once you have done that explain to me how those behaviour differences justify the differences in reporting that is clearly evident here:

www.2oceansvibe.com

Kate Versus Meghan – The Headline Comparisons Are Startling

When you put the headlines side-by-side, it's hard to ignore the fact that the media is far nicer to Kate, than they are to Meghan.
www.2oceansvibe.com www.2oceansvibe.com
 
BoroMart said:
So what have they done that is so evil and so 'look at me'?
Click to expand...
I've never remotely mentioned "evil", but if you have missed the "look at me" behaviour then pointing it out will go straight past you too.
Crack on with your indignation.
 
Adi_Dem said:
Tell me the ways in which she has behaved differently. And then once you have done that explain to me how those behaviour differences justify the differences in reporting that is clearly evident here:

www.2oceansvibe.com

Kate Versus Meghan – The Headline Comparisons Are Startling

When you put the headlines side-by-side, it's hard to ignore the fact that the media is far nicer to Kate, than they are to Meghan.
www.2oceansvibe.com www.2oceansvibe.com
Click to expand...
Sorry Adi, do I report into you.
Thought not.
 
Avocados.

people-are-comparing-how-differently-the-press-treats-kate-middleton-and-meghan-markle.jpg


No racism there?
 
Muttley said:
Avocados.

people-are-comparing-how-differently-the-press-treats-kate-middleton-and-meghan-markle.jpg


No racism there?
Click to expand...

Apparently Muttley they have been treated differently because they have behaved differently. But nobody reports into me so I can't get to the evidence of that sadly. Check out my link above with loads more examples.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top