I’d rather first see a trial with helmets, at a higher age than 12 of courseMaybe its to see how no heading affects the game, prior to a blanket ban?
Not necessarily. It could do the opposite. If over head height is still allowed then it encourages launching balls forward that can't be defended. If over head height isn't allowed then kids will be learning proper football very late.Regardless of dementia, no heading (or maybe some limitations) would improve the quality of football being served up no end.
Been mooted for a while now. Isn’t it about mastering the techniques in training now using a foam ball? Heading still allowed in games?Just announced.
Not sure whether this is a blanket ban.
The objective appears to be around prevention of dementia later in life.
It is either going to be an awfully long trial or I’m missing something.
i thought it was 'no purposely' heading of the ball - accidental is still ok.
Maybe its to see how no heading affects the game, prior to a blanket ban?
agreed, I've taught from U5 to U18 and I'd say before U15 there are very very few headers per game.my son is u12 season coming up and my other son u10 - you can count on one hand the amount of headers in a game so it won't really affect much at that age group.
Be interested to see the stats for numbers of headers per game in the modern era compared to 30-40 years ago. Sure there must be a lot less long balls for defenders/forwards to head so hopefully that along with the lighter balls would have an impactagreed, I've taught from U5 to U18 and I'd say before U15 there are very very few headers per game.
I'd hope modern balls have made a big difference, the players that have had issues in recent years largely were heading in the 60s and 70s with balls that were 4 times heavier in the rain. Modern balls don't do that and should be far less harmful but we don't know until we have some data.
The no coaching headers thing has been going on a few years, but I didn't really get that as then the rare occasion kids were heading the ball, they didn't have the correct technique and we often using the top of their heads, which i would have thought could be more harmful. The banning of headers outright makes much more sense.One of my colleagues is coaching up to that age group and they've been told not to teach them heading, but it's not against the rules for them to head it during games.
How do you create good technique without repition?The no coaching headers thing has been going on a few years, but I didn't really get that as then the rare occasion kids were heading the ball, they didn't have the correct technique and we often using the top of their heads, which i would have thought could be more harmful. The banning of headers outright makes much more sense.
There's plenty of time for kids to learn heading after the age of 12. Before that they should probably be concentrating on learning proper foot skills (which are more important overall anyway).How do you create good technique without repition?
Banning heading, and this is not ban can only creater poor technique within the trial U12 leagues that are affected.
Children’s brains do not have the amount of coating, or myelination, as adult brains. Additionally, nerve fibers in children allow more acceleration of the brain with a big hit, and because the brain is lighter than an adult brain, it can move more easily. This lack of myelin and ability of the brain to move more easily with a head hit leads to it being easier for nerve cells to be torn when injured.
Just like to point out that it's a bit of a myth that modern footballs are lighter than the old ones.Be interested to see the stats for numbers of headers per game in the modern era compared to 30-40 years ago. Sure there must be a lot less long balls for defenders/forwards to head so hopefully that along with the lighter balls would have an impact
There's plenty of time for kids to learn heading after the age of 12. Before that they should probably be concentrating on learning proper foot skills (which are more important overall anyway).
I coached youth football for about 20 years and I would agree with those who have pointed out above, that there's usually not much heading in u-12 football (and below) anyway.
There's also the scientific fact that children's brains lack the full myelination that adult brains have, making them more susceptible to developing long-term adverse effects from impacts to the head.
Why are kids at greater risk for concussion?