festas_shin
Active member
I have had insurance for a couple of years through insurance to go as it was recommended through the Martin Lewis site.
However have recently tried to claim for a lost phone and they have rejected the claim because the device was used on the network 1.5 days before being reported stolen.
I work at home and am always on WiFi rather than my mobile data so there may be frequent gaps between uses but I don't see why that should cause a genuine claim to be rejected.
So just to make you aware of this small print clause should you be thinking of which insurance to take out.
I'm now stuck paying for a handset for 18 months that I no longer have. What is the point of even bothering with insurance
However have recently tried to claim for a lost phone and they have rejected the claim because the device was used on the network 1.5 days before being reported stolen.
I work at home and am always on WiFi rather than my mobile data so there may be frequent gaps between uses but I don't see why that should cause a genuine claim to be rejected.
So just to make you aware of this small print clause should you be thinking of which insurance to take out.
I'm now stuck paying for a handset for 18 months that I no longer have. What is the point of even bothering with insurance