Michael Carrick

viv_andersons_nana said:
Giggs was working at Manchester United, would you want him at the Boro? How do you know what sort of football Carrick would have us playing?
Click to expand...
Viv do you now realise that people weren’t scaremongering and that there was a big problem at the club

Surely that cold tweet confirms that all wasn’t good.
 
Jedi boro said:
Viv do you now realise that people weren’t scaremongering and that there was a big problem at the club

Surely that cold tweet confirms that all wasn’t good.
Click to expand...
Not for certain, no. It could’ve been the sh*t results and the sh*t football we’d started playing. Anything else is speculation TBH.
 
viv_andersons_nana said:
Giggs was working at Manchester United, would you want him at the Boro? How do you know what sort of football Carrick would have us playing?
Click to expand...
What has Giggs got to do with Carrick? No one knows what football any manager will play until they get here. Im sure you rubbished the thought of Robson, McClaren and Karanka too. Why do you always have to be Sarky when you dont agree with someones else opinion. Its nauseating.
 
TheWolfman said:
What has Giggs got to do with Carrick? No one knows what football any manager will play until they get here. Im sure you rubbished the thought of Robson, McClaren and Karanka too. Why do you always have to be Sarky when you dont agree with someones else opinion. Its nauseating.
Click to expand...
It’s not being sarky. It’s asking why people want particular managers, especially when those people haven’t coached or managed at first team level before. It’s interesting to see what and why people think about these candidates.
 
I am not against it. Corberan, Carrick, Big Dunc I wouldn't mind.

Edwards I am a bit more on the fence with. Gives me Garry Monk vibes
 
This is pure speculation from me but I think his reluctance to use the academy was a big part of it.

Just my view but Gibson has based our model around this and to see it overlooked I found odd.
 
Jedi boro said:
This is pure speculation from me but I think his reluctance to use the academy was a big part of it.

Just my view but Gibson has based our model around this and to see it overlooked I found odd.
Click to expand...
It’s more likely his refusal to not use Forss and Hoppe. It does feel now like they were keeping their powder dry for the next bloke in terms of spending that Tav and Spence cash.
 
Jedi boro said:
I agree

The line up inc the bench on wed should be interesting now.
Click to expand...
I think one thing that irked is that we signed someone like Luongo when we really have no intention of using him. He’s there to pad out the bench. But then you’d have to ask why the club sanctioned the deal if that’s all it was for. Another few thousand quid down the sh*tter, let’s be honest.
 
viv_andersons_nana said:
I think one thing that irked is that we signed someone like Luongo when we really have no intention of using him. He’s there to pad out the bench. But then you’d have to ask why the club sanctioned the deal if that’s all it was for. Another few thousand quid down the sh*tter, let’s be honest.
Click to expand...
It’s been crazy for for some time mate as is referring to a player the same age as the one who is starting in his space as a kid that needs to develop

Forrs and mcgree.

They weren’t on the same page at all and that never good.
 
viv_andersons_nana said:
It’s more likely his refusal to not use Forss and Hoppe. It does feel now like they were keeping their powder dry for the next bloke in terms of spending that Tav and Spence cash.
Click to expand...
If that was the case then loaning all the players we did was a complete waste of time. We might as well have got rid of Wilder in the summer if he wasn’t on board with the way the club is working.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top