I hope that's not true.Yes that's true. I don't think MFC engages in reciprocal deals though.
Looks like it's our fault. Leeds are open to reciprocal deals for away fans but we don't seem keen.Cardiff fans only paid £21 as Cardiff city accepted a reciprocal deal with lufc.
Looks like it's our fault. Leeds are open to reciprocal deals for away fans but we don't seem keen.
Reading the Twitter thread Leeds fans are saying LUFC are using it as a weapon to get a better deal for their travelling fans. Other clubs take advantage of their fans because they know they'll sell out. LUFC are saying 'if you don't want your fans to pay £47 make us an offer'.I don't think it makes much sense for the club to refuse when the gulf is so big.
"We'll charge you £31, the same as our home fans."
Unless Leeds were expecting reciprocal cheaper pricing.
Yes, its £31 for away fans no matter which game it is.I hope that's not true.
Have been working on this all week.Yes, its £31 for away fans no matter which game it is.
No. Not true. Been working on this all week with Boro and FSA and different fan groups for other championship clubs.Looks like it's our fault. Leeds are open to reciprocal deals for away fans but we don't seem keen.
Fixed it for youBasically Boro think away fans and home fans who won't / can't get season cards are lesser fans than season card holders, so they don't give a toss
Boro spoke to me about this offer last week - we talked about it at the Forum Meeting on Monday with Boro and since then I have been in conversation with the Leeds Fans Trust - who emailed me about this at the start of the month. Have also this week spoken with Football Supporters Association, Hull, Cardiff City fan groups as well been in conversation with Millwall.Basically Boro think away fans are lesser fans than home ones, so they don't give a toss.