Joshua Pulev

Chris_Boro said:
Thought it was self explanatory myself.

To suggest Joshua is avoiding Fury because he's scared is nonsense and lacks any form of objective thinking.

Similar to your assertion that Wilder beats Joshua because he's a robot.
Click to expand...
Why is it nonsense, oh wise one?
 
Scubahood said:
I didn't say he was confident of it, I just said he would have beaten him IMO. Joshua is a stiff robot.
Click to expand...
So is Ortiz. But AJ is a taller, more powerful and younger 'stiff robot'. Ortiz won every round against Wilder, both times, just ran out of steam to finish the job. AJ would beat up Wilder within about 4 rounds.
 
Chappy112 said:
Fury has 3 very special performances, his resume isn't as balanced as AJ's but he has 3 performances that are better than anything on AJ's resume. AJ has a very good win vs Klitschko and the rest are good wins.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't go that far. His win vs Klitschko is special, both in terms of opponent and performance. AJs win against Klitshcko is special too, ok he was 2 years older but Klitschko was in superb shape and was beaten by the sheer power of the shots he took, not gassing. Different ways to win, both impressive.

As for Fury's win and draw over Wilder. Wilder was unproven. Ask yourself what Wilders career defining win is? beating a 40 year old cuban with a heart defect who was a great amateur but has never won the title. Wilder is a fraud. A puncher but not a boxer. Image without the resume to back it up. He's a highlights reel boxer, but scratching at the surface the image falls apart. Saying that for Fury to get a draw against him first time was a brilliant performance due to the circumstances of his journey. I fully expected him to win the second fight comfortably. He was fully fit, and he had already experienced Wilder at his best and it wasn't good enough.
 
Scubahood said:
No, you're arrogant for trying to belittle and condescend anybody who disagrees with you.
Click to expand...
disagreeing is one thing, but I'll point out an opposing opinion when you talk nonsense. We both have opinions, you started the arrogance, I'll match it
 
Scubahood said:
I'm disagreeing with you claiming that Joshua would beat up Wilder in 4 rounds.
Click to expand...
So you agree that Wilder got schooled in both fights by Ortiz? Ortiz is a poundland AJ, he is smaller, much older, less powerful, less reach. But he does fight straight like AJ. He caused Wilder all kinds of trouble but his stamina/age stopped him sealing the deal.
 
BoroMart said:
disagreeing is one thing, but I'll point out an opposing opinion when you talk nonsense. We both have opinions, you started the arrogance, I'll match it
Click to expand...
Nope, you're incredibly arrogant and you try to belittle and condescend people who dare to challenge your opinions. You're actually pretty well known for it on here. I'm not getting into a slagging match anyway, just kinda feel sorry for you that you lack the self-awareness to see it. Have a great evening. 👍
 
Scubahood said:
Nope, you're incredibly arrogant and you try to belittle and condescend people who dare to challenge your opinions. You're actually pretty well known for it on here. I'm not getting into a slagging match anyway, just kinda feel sorry for you that you lack the self-awareness to see it. Have a great evening. 👍
Click to expand...
You need a mirror mate...seems you're gonna dodge the reality of Wilders performances vs Ortiz and what it says about him and about what an AJ fight would look like. I mean lets be honest Oriz is the closest to AJ he has fought
 
Scubahood said:
Why is it nonsense, oh wise one?
Click to expand...

Because its an opinion that you could not possibly know unless you personally know Joshua, you're making it up to suit your preference.

You seem to dislike Joshua to a point that you refuse objective thinking on his abilities.

1 second longer on the canvas versus Wilder and Fury v Joshua would never be getting a mention. Thats boxing.
 
Scubahood said:
Nope, you're incredibly arrogant and you try to belittle and condescend people who dare to challenge your opinions. You're actually pretty well known for it on here. I'm not getting into a slagging match anyway, just kinda feel sorry for you that you lack the self-awareness to see it. Have a great evening. 👍
Click to expand...
stay in your sae space mate, I mean if you don't wan't someone to actually challenge your words on a messageboard then that's about as arrogant as it gets in the 21st century
 
Oh scubs, are you really going to carry on with the passive-aggressive laughing at everything I post. Of course you are...and I'm apparently the petty one :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top