NoloBoro
Well-known member
As soon as I saw his name, this was what first sprung to mind. I liked him a lot but as other posters have rightly stated, we had some great strikers around that period. He’d walk into the current setup!Rules:
As soon as I saw his name, this was what first sprung to mind. I liked him a lot but as other posters have rightly stated, we had some great strikers around that period. He’d walk into the current setup!Rules:
I was in that very same concourse!! Didn’t realise it was his dad though. Assumed it was a fan. Love that!His Dad and other family members used to come and watch him and used to sit near me, at the end of one game when Job had scored his Dad was running up and down the concourse after full time (we were having a pint after) and he was singing one Job on Teesside (sounding strange to us because of the accent) and waving the Cameroon flag. It was brill!
They would all have smashed the championship. I rate Nemeth as the best of the three, then Job, then Maccarone.I agree, Maccarone, Nemeth and Job were all good players in their own right but we were missing a presence upfront for a few years till Jimmy, Yak and Viduka all rocked up!
Job better than Maccarone? Not so sure about that. All 3 would dominate this league though.They would all have smashed the championship. I rate Nemeth as the best of the three, then Job, then Maccarone.
One of Job's key weapons when he arrived was his heading ability, he was like a salmon, but then he fractured his skull and didn't really go in for headers so often, which cost him 10% of his game.
Job was more of a wide forward than an out and out CF, he had better pace, more tricky, more creativity, better in the air. Maccarone was decent poacher but had a lot more holes to his game. If Maccarone hadn't scored the last minute UEFA winners I don't think this conversation would be even had. But that's my opinion.Job better than Maccarone? Not so sure about that. All 3 would dominate this league though.