Johnsons kid

Brilliant coops, all leftists, or indeed not right wingers are being pigeonholed by you, not exactly a fair summation of millions of people.

As was abusing mogg with his child.
The main commentary was feeling sorry for the lad being paraded in a suite in front of baying crowds. A cowardly act by his father, using a child as a human shield to avoid public scrutiny. But of course it's the public that's wrong not his Dad :rolleyes:

They dork see anything wrong with that either.
I and others did take issue with the crowds snapping at Mogg when the kid was there, but it was the dads choice to dress him in a suite and drag him through a baying crowd. He must take responsibility for putting his son in the public eye and putting him in a volatile position. It's strong how on one hand you take issue with the publics perceived behaviour towards a child, yet you are perfectly happy for Tory MPs to put their kids in the public eye as PR stunts or as human shields. It's almost like you have zero objectivity when it comes to Tory MPs.

Perfectly all ok to stand out Cummings house who has a child ranting and raving, they don’t see an issue with that either
Most of the people outside Cummings house were press, most of which are not left leaning. But again, deflection, Cummings put his child in danger multiple times, from a) putting his kid in a car with a covid infected family and driving for 6 hours, b) driving the kid to hospital while he himself was apparently gravely ill with covid, and c) driving a third time while potentially unsighted with his kid. But you ignore that and focus on the press and a couple of neighbours shouting at Cummings.

So the conclusion from this seems to be that Coops doesn't think that politicians/SPAGs who have children should be held accountable because the kids might get upset. unbelievable, except we've all read enough of your Tory nonsense to totally believe it.
 
I'm sorry, but the thread is labelled 'Johnson's kid' and it even has a photo of his kid in the thread.....so yes you (and whoever) are using his child in some way shape or form.

And it's disgusting to be honest.
It's labelled Johnson's kid -- don't judge a book by it's cover, or a thread by it's title.

The photo is a public domain photo from a PR opportunity sanctioned by Johnson and number 10, blame them for the picture. THEY are using the child, it shouldn't even be in the public eye. THEY chose that course.

Give me these disgusting comments aimed at the child.....
 
It's labelled Johnson's kid -- don't judge a book by it's cover, or a thread by it's title.

The photo is a public domain photo from a PR opportunity sanctioned by Johnson and number 10, blame them for the picture. THEY are using the child, it shouldn't even be in the public eye.


article-1019140-013738EB00000578-514_308x185.jpg


l6mzojpcv9mwkesu9drm


37733345_1124111404403243_330941549577764864_n.jpg


Why not, everyone else does it?
 
I'm sorry, but the thread is labelled 'Johnson's kid' and it even has a photo of his kid in the thread.....so yes you (and whoever) are using his child in some way shape or form.

And it's disgusting to be honest.
Who took the photograph and who authorized its release to the media?
 
It's labelled Johnson's kid -- don't judge a book by it's cover, or a thread by it's title.

The photo is a public domain photo from a PR opportunity sanctioned by Johnson and number 10, blame them for the picture. THEY are using the child, it shouldn't even be in the public eye. THEY chose that course.

Give me these disgusting comments aimed at the child.....
I said the thread is disgusting.

Irrespective of who published it in the media, this thread is using 'Johnson's kid' completely different and is using it as a way of having a pop.

Like I said, such bad taste.

Didn't think some would lower themselves, but clearly they do.

That's the last I'll comment on this thread.
 
It definitely isn't Little Legs, he'll be busy down the Cross.
Do you find RWNJ offensive or do the clique just have an issue with libtard?
 
Irrespective of who published it in the media, this thread is using 'Johnson's kid' completely different and is using it as a way of having a pop.

Like I said, such bad taste.

Didn't think some would lower themselves, but clearly they do.

That's the last I'll comment on this thread
They're having a pop at the PM, who is fair game. I asked you to give an example of where anyone is having a pop at the kid, you can't instead you'll scuttle off, you have proven my point for me
 
Missed the point haven't you? Boris has made no issue of his kid being in the public eye, the issue is with the nasty tone of a thread on here using his child and the way his child looks to claim a conspiracy.
Ridiculous, and in very poor taste.

Go to the top of the clique BoroMart.
Bored with you - ignored.
 
Back
Top