Archiestephens_elbow
Well-known member
Starmer would not tell fibs about his kids
This thread about a 3 month old innocent baby says a damn sight more about those who are taking the p on the thread than it says about Johnson. Can you imagine the uproar on here if someone had posted these comments about Starmer’s kid? Pathetic and desperate.
The thread is literally titled Johnson's kidThe thread isn’t really about a 3 month old kid is it?
You have just made that up
Got to say I agree johnsons a d*ck but using the kid isn't poor form by anyone's standards, he does enough to discredit himself without using childrenThat’s not the point is it? By all means have a go directly at Johnson, he is fair game but using his BABY as a means of attacking him is cheap and tacky and does you no credit whatsoever.
The thread is literally titled Johnson's kid
I really don't I just thought it was funny, but I agree with foggys sentiment that you can hammer Boris without bringing kids into it, the man's a plebIt is - correct.
But you know the thread isn’t really about the kid, Come on, you do know really
You just want an argument
To those saying it's about Johnson's kid and that people shouldn't use Johnson's kid to get at him, what have you learned about Johnsons kid from this thread?
He's the biggest 3 month old since king Kong was a littlun who has shrunk since his last media appearance, you couldn't make it up why not just leave kids out of it?To those saying it's about Johnson's kid and that people shouldn't use Johnson's kid to get at him, what have you learned about Johnsons kid from this thread?
It’s mental isn’t it. The internet is literally full of nutters. It only takes a couple to get together to produce a thread like this.
I mean how many other people’s children do you sit discussing on the internet with random people.
There is hell on here - from tory apologists. Incidentally, the pics of them with the child that are in the public domain came from the couple themselves. If you're going to use your child, as he has, in an attempt to bolster your popularity, then the public are going to talk about it.This thread is bad form.
There would be hell on on here if the target was a labour leaders kid.
There is hell on here - from tory apologists. Incidentally, the pics of them with the child that are in the public domain came from the couple themselves. If you're going to use your child, as he has, in an attempt to bolster your popularity, then the public are going to talk about it.
Well thought out and neatly structured feedback, thanks. By the way, the space between your single-word review and its attendant exclamation mark is surplus to grammatical requirements.Pathetic !
double patheticPathetic !