sweet_left_foot
Well-known member
solicitors exist to tax the fact that money is the root of all evil
Title transfer doesn't necessarily require a solicitor. I've done my own conveyancing in the past, and used Land Registry forms TR1, AP1, and ID1 I think. (Edit: That was when I was buying a place)On a very basic level, a transfer of title requires a solicitor. From there they can advise you of the rest.
If your mams house was bought before 1986 you'll need a solicitors. , if she bought it after you can change the deeds direct with land registry at durhamTitle transfer doesn't necessarily require a solicitor. I've done my own conveyancing in the past, and used Land Registry forms TR1, AP1, and ID1 I think. (Edit: That was when I was buying a place)
If it's pretty explicit in the will that the property is going to the OP and his sister, title transfer (following probate) should be pretty simple, and a solicitor shouldn't be required.
Unregistered property will need to be registered. This process can still be done without a solicitor, but is an extra level of complication. Various searches and form filling and proofs will be required, hence why many/most people would go down the solicitor route.If your mams house was bought before 1986 you'll need a solicitors. , if she bought it after you can change the deeds direct with land registry at durham
Title transfer doesn't necessarily require a solicitor. I've done my own conveyancing in the past, and used Land Registry forms TR1, AP1, and ID1 I think. (Edit: That was when I was buying a place)
If it's pretty explicit in the will that the property is going to the OP and his sister, title transfer (following probate) should be pretty simple, and a solicitor shouldn't be required.