How do we line up v sunlun

Jedi boro

Well-known member
Mainly up top, but as we have a few returnees and a few more options at the back what are you going with barring any late additions
 
All of a sudden we have a few options. There's competition for places at CB and CM.

I think it will be...

.................Glover
Ayling...Fry...RVDB...Thomas
........Howson...Barlaser
Forss.......Azaz.......Hackney
...........Greenwood
 
All of a sudden we have a few options. There's competition for places at CB and CM.

I think it will be...

.................Glover
Ayling...Fry...RVDB...Thomas
........Howson...Barlaser
Forss.......Azaz.......Hackney
...........Greenwood
Greenwood up top ???
 
All of a sudden we have a few options. There's competition for places at CB and CM.

I think it will be...

.................Glover
Ayling...Fry...RVDB...Thomas
........Howson...Barlaser
Forss.......Azaz.......Hackney
...........Greenwood

I toyed with Howson Barlasar and Hackney in the front three for my line up too - I think if Coburn doesn't start, MC will go with this - but if Coburn starts he'll want Greenwood in the team.
 
I toyed with Howson Barlasar and Hackney in the front three for my line up too - I think if Coburn doesn't start, MC will go with this - but if Coburn starts he'll want Greenwood in the team.
I much prefer the team you posted. I don't like Hackney being pushed forward. He's one of our best players, probably our best, he should be played in his strongest position where he can influence the game the most.

He just needs to make a decision on who his best 2 CMs are. I think you are right with Hackney and Howson.
 
At this stage (and assuming no injuries back) I reckon it will be

Glover

Engel
Fry
vdB
Ayling

Howson
Hackney

Greenwood
Crooks
Azaz
Forss

Front 4 could almost line up in any combination. I suppose it's possible that Hackney plays further forward and O'Brien/Barlaser come in.
Coburn would probably start for Azaz if he was fully fit.

Subs: J Jones, Thomas, Clarke, McNair, Dijksteel, O'Brien, Barlaser, Coburn, Gilbert, u21

Suddenly looks a lot stronger and with Silvera, McGree, I Jones, Lath to return.
Wouldn't be surprised if we aren't signing anyone else.
 
I much prefer the team you posted. I don't like Hackney being pushed forward. He's one of our best players, probably our best, he should be played in his strongest position where he can influence the game the most.

He just needs to make a decision on who his best 2 CMs are. I think you are right with Hackney and Howson.

Yeah I'm sticking with my line-up prediction, but we do have more cover in CDM now with Howson, Hackney, Barlasar and O'Brien...

Without Rogers - there's only 5 players for 3 positions at LW CAM RW now... so although I prefer Hackney at CDM, it makes sense to push him up.
 
Yeah I'm sticking with my line-up prediction, but we do have more cover in CDM now with Howson, Hackney, Barlasar and O'Brien...

Without Rogers - there's only 5 players for 3 positions at LW CAM RW now... so although I prefer Hackney at CDM, it makes sense to push him up.
We have:

Jones - X
Forss
Crooks
Azaz
Greenwood
McGree - X
Silvera - X
Gilbert

So we have 8 players. Unless you mean 5 available which will change shortly as McGree and Silvera will return.

Just pick 3 from the 5 players available for the attacking 3 positions and pick 2 for the 4 available for the CM positions.
If you move Hackney forward you have 6 players available for the 3 forward positions and 3 available for the 2 CM positions which makes less sense.

Hackney isn't as good playing in that LAM position. He can't influence the game as much. We miss his energy and drive in the middle. Barlaser isn't good enough to justify making that change.
 
All of a sudden we have a few options. There's competition for places at CB and CM.

I think it will be...

.................Glover
Ayling...Fry...RVDB...Thomas
........Howson...Barlaser
Forss.......Azaz.......Hackney
...........Greenwood
I like the idea of Greenwood up top

—————Glover————-
Ayling—Fry—Clarke—Engel
——Howson—Hackney——
-Forss—Azaz—Greenwood
—————-Crooks———-

I think it might be that tho
 
I like the idea of Greenwood up top

—————Glover————-
Ayling—Fry—Clarke—Engel
——Howson—Hackney——
-Forss—Azaz—Greenwood
—————-Crooks———-

I think it might be that tho
I can't see Barlaser not starting. Carrick seems to like him and he's improved a lot over the last couple of months since he's had a run of games.
 
I can't see Barlaser not starting. Carrick seems to like him and he's improved a lot over the last couple of months since he's had a run of games.
Maybe we change things up slightly with out shape then and have Howdon, Barlaser and Hackney in mf?
 
We have:

Jones - X
Forss
Crooks
Azaz
Greenwood
McGree - X
Silvera - X
Gilbert

So we have 8 players. Unless you mean 5 available which will change shortly as McGree and Silvera will return.

Just pick 3 from the 5 players available for the attacking 3 positions and pick 2 for the 4 available for the CM positions.
If you move Hackney forward you have 6 players available for the 3 forward positions and 3 available for the 2 CM positions which makes less sense.

Hackney isn't as good playing in that LAM position. He can't influence the game as much. We miss his energy and drive in the middle. Barlaser isn't good enough to justify making that change.

I agree with everything there - but the question is what we think MC will do/how we think we're going to line up, not how we would line them up if we were the manager.

I still think...

Glover
Ayling - Fry - RVDB - Thomas
Howson - Hackney
Forss - Azaz - Greenwood
Coburn

But I can also see the argument for Hackney further up if Coburn and Jones aren't fit.... Forss is the only player who can play RW naturally - which leaves Crooks/Greenwood as the ST...

Forss - Azaz - Greenwood
Crooks

Forss - Crooks - Azaz
Greenwood

We'd only have Gilbert to bring on further up the pitch - as I can't see him switching Hackney from CDM to LW in the middle of the game... so having him start there, gives us an option off the bench.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B_G
Back
Top