Are you deliberately obtuse. I was not comparring AK with Dyche as managers, read it again. I was suggesting Boro should have stuck with Karanka and given him the chance to get us back up the following season, like Burnley did with Dyche. I also praised Burnley and Dyche. However, some of our fanbase wanted the manager gone after the Charlton debacle the year before, they judged and had a chip on their shoulders, following which 4 senior players spoke out for AK to the chairman. Many fans without knowing what actually happened lost it then.
Many on here before a PL ball was kicked were arguing 17th would be a success. A lot of people lost sight of reality after Christmas 2016. AK did not help himself after the WHU home game i will agree. He was misguided, but it was his Basque temperament and frustration that spilled out as he was not getting in the types of players we needed. The players that were earlier signed, Fischer, Espinosa, Negredo, Valdes, were free or cheap due to serious previous injuries, Espinosa wasn’t fit when signed. Guzan and Traore were from a relegated club as was The Donkey in January. Fabio was signed on the cheap he too had been relegated the season before Villa were. There was a pattern, players who were cheapish who either signed cheaply through hope they’d get mojo’s back after previous serious injury or relegation quantity over quality. De Roon was the only potentially exciting signing, but he was often lost, Traore was a project.
The club seemingly had a cabinet style recruitment set up several people inputted, the manager did not always get his way, then there was Orta in the mix too. Orta was head of European recruitment and is on record as saying he learned from his recruitment mistakes at Middlesbrough the players from Spain were were his recommendation. Karanka was a head coach, not the manager. I respectfully suggest you learn the difference in roles. Karanka did not have overall control as fans believed he did.