JM14
Well-known member
No he doesntIt was a good finish, but let it go fellas. He does have the worst conversion ratio of any striker in the prem, btw.
No he doesntIt was a good finish, but let it go fellas. He does have the worst conversion ratio of any striker in the prem, btw.
Exactly col the notion Pullis sanctioned this is crazy as nothing absolutely nothing happens at MFC without gibsons say so.Only one man responsible for his sale and it wasn’t Pulis. Uncle Steve accepted the money NOT Uncle Tony, he just made sure the player wanted to sign (Imho)
Not sure Heam, it was a stat I heard from a pundit on sky sportsI don’t think that’s true.
Yes he does - see my earlier reply to heam. Of course the pundit may be wrong, I don't know.No he doesnt
I just looked this up, Bamford scores 1 from 5.4 shots, not sure if that is worse than most strikers, looks low to me, but there must be worse.No he doesnt
How long ago did you hear it?Not sure Heam, it was a stat I heard from a pundit on sky sports
couple of weeks ago, maybe over christmas. As I recal it was the commentator who said it.How long ago did you hear it?
Kanes's is almost the same as Bamford's. Get rid of both to the Championship as they're clearly rubbish. (Kane 1 goal for 5.7 shots, so sightly worse than Bamford.)couple of weeks ago, maybe over christmas. As I recal it was the commentator who said it.
I don’t think any manager except Bielsa would have got these levels of performance out of him.
That said, Gibson has done well to let the fans blame Pulis for flogging him on the cheap to Leeds.