Fury V Usyk.

Hope Usyk wins.

He is a drug cheat (tainted boar meat my ass) and a charlatan. Lied about giving money to mental health charities and moans at other boxers for doing things he does himself.

Oh and his "singing" ... fml

Overrated boxer who is good but not great, Lennox Lewis would have boxed his ears off and Joshua would also beat him (styles make fight)

If anyone has watched Tyson's career closely you will know he struggles with smaller fighters with high outputs, he also has a blind spot for an overhand right especially behind a left feint.

He loses this and will be knocked down at least once is my prediction.
 
Usyk v Dubois, I still dont think it was a low blow btw..... Fury is gonna target the body bigtime after seeing how Usyk went down and took the full time out period
 
Fury could make it boring and stay behind the long jab all night to win on points but Usyk is easily the best boxer in the division and may be able to put the pressure on like nobody else can against Fury. I’m hoping he’s good enough to overcome the size difference.
 
If Fury wins, I'll be buzzing because a British fighter has unified the titles.

If Usyk wins, I'll be alright because Fury has came across like a massive helmet for years.
 
I presume that after the near miss that Usyk had with Dubois that Fury will work the body and win by stoppage.
 
Alzi said:
I hope Usyk knocks his block off.

The FMTTM mental gymnastics to prove Joshua’s CV is still superior to Fury’s if Fury does win will be something else mind.

“Yes he beat Usyk but I haven’t seen Fury beat Gary Cornish yet”
Click to expand...

I don’t agree. I prefer AJ (for his CV and willingness to fight) over Fury (I don’t dislike Fury though, just thinks he’s a bit of a plonker / Jackanory, although he did grow on me whilst watching the documentary).

But if Fury beats Uysk, even if someone felt AJ had a better CV (due to number of title fights / defences / bouts against top level fighters etc and how quickly he did it).

I don’t think it could be argued that Fury hadn’t “overtaken” AJ, simply as he would then have beaten then only man AJ hasn’t been able to beat.

AJ would then need to beat Fury and/or Uysk to be back in the conversation.
 
Heam44 said:
I don’t agree. I prefer AJ (for his CV and willingness to fight) over Fury (I don’t dislike Fury though, just thinks he’s a bit of a plonker / Jackanory, although he did grow on me whilst watching the documentary).

But if Fury beats Uysk, even if someone felt AJ had a better CV (due to number of title fights / defences / bouts against top level fighters etc and how quickly he did it).

I don’t think it could be argued that Fury hadn’t “overtaken” AJ, simply as he would then have beaten then only man AJ hasn’t been able to beat.

AJ would then need to beat Fury and/or Uysk to be back in the conversation.
Click to expand...
Joshua is just the new Frank Bruno, a limited but well managed/protected fighter, in previous heavyweight era's he'd have been semi successful but nowhere near the top of the rankings.
Fury is a genuine top heavyweight who, if he'd managed to look after himself in previous times could've mixed it with the top fighters.
👊👶👊
 
Centralscrutinizer said:
Joshua is just the new Frank Bruno, a limited but well managed/protected fighter, in previous heavyweight era's he'd have been semi successful but nowhere near the top of the rankings.
Fury is a genuine top heavyweight who, if he'd managed to look after himself in previous times could've mixed it with the top fighters.
👊👶👊
Click to expand...

There are plenty of genuine criticisms to throw at AJ but don’t make up b0llocks. To say he’s been protected is frankly laughable. Hes been way more willing to take risks than any other top heavyweight over the last 7-8 years. Your comment just makes you look silly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top