Eight weeks in jail for telling the truth

Randy said:
I believe that's called game, set, match.
Click to expand...
I think not. I've seen a local Tory and freemason protected against being incarcerated by a senior judge of the day, Lord Hailsham. It can be found in Hansard and was reported at the time by the Guardian. Multiple counts of rape and abuse of children and adults, both male and female.
 
r00fie1 said:
What wasnt the "truth"?
Click to expand...
I edited my post to add belief before I saw your reply.
It may be you were making a general point, I was referring to the making of the comments the chap made which were found to be in contempt.
 
I think the facts are we are on the road to making our grandkids lives a living hell
Without wishing to be party political the number of homes insulated each year has declined dramatically therefore that was his motivation to act in the way that he did.
He has been found guilty due to the change in the law and will be sentenced for that. It was petty of the judge to add 8 weeks to his sentence.
We can now protest against that change.
What do we do if the judge tells us we can't use the fact that the new laws are evil and draconian as a reason for our protest.
 
WindyNook said:
I think the facts are we are on the road to making our grandkids lives a living hell
Without wishing to be party political the number of homes insulated each year has declined dramatically therefore that was his motivation to act in the way that he did.
He has been found guilty due to the change in the law and will be sentenced for that. It was petty of the judge to add 8 weeks to his sentence.
We can now protest against that change.
What do we do if the judge tells us we can't use the fact that the new laws are evil and draconian as a reason for our protest.
Click to expand...
The judge reduced his sentence by a third because he pleaded guilty.

The 8 weeks was a separate issue because of contempt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top