ThatFragranceGuy
Well-known member
The season when britt scored 15 goals at forest he played 2415 minutes (26.8 sets of 90 minutes) over 29 appearances so for the large part he played the full 90 mins per appearance (only didn't do so on 8 occasions, 9 if you count the game he got a red card in the 88th minute and one of those occasions was where he went off and needed knee surgery). He missed 16 games after that Wigan game with his knee recovery but was already on 15 goals. the following season was his recovery season so can understand some subbing during that season - he still got 14 goals. He then came here and had to play under Pulis's defensive setup and stories of strikers being limited in training, and Monk with his ever changing tactics. He still got 15 goals in his first season despite loads of games where he only played for a few minutes, 10 minutes, 20 minutes etc - 9 appearances in his debut season as a £15m striker where he played for less than half the game.
When Britt scored 15 for us he played 2982 minutes (33.13 sets of 90 minutes) however this was over 44 appearances so often didn't play the full 90 minutes, in fact only played the full 90 minutes for 20 of those 44 appearances. The season he scored 14 for us he played 45 mins or less 14 times and was only on the bench for 4 games as an unused sub. 14 times only he played the full 90 mins.
Playing up front is largely a confidence based game. We often chop and change the team around and sub people off. I'm not really surprised this messes with players heads. Not saying he should have a guaranteed start, but people are comparing apples to oranges by comparing his goal return at boro to his goal return at forst when he was either coming back from injury or at least started and finished most the games he was played in.
When Britt scored 15 for us he played 2982 minutes (33.13 sets of 90 minutes) however this was over 44 appearances so often didn't play the full 90 minutes, in fact only played the full 90 minutes for 20 of those 44 appearances. The season he scored 14 for us he played 45 mins or less 14 times and was only on the bench for 4 games as an unused sub. 14 times only he played the full 90 mins.
Playing up front is largely a confidence based game. We often chop and change the team around and sub people off. I'm not really surprised this messes with players heads. Not saying he should have a guaranteed start, but people are comparing apples to oranges by comparing his goal return at boro to his goal return at forst when he was either coming back from injury or at least started and finished most the games he was played in.