Boro to appeal Dijksteel red card

[TeaCider]

Is it just a one match ban?

It is.

But I think it's worth appealing anyway, we're very short defensively as is and Smith is coming back from an injury.

 

[UTB70]

If only darnell fisher was fit he would be ideal

 

[Jimmy_Salmon]

If only darnell fisher was fit he would be ideal

He’s actually back in training!

 

[alanmoodysdog]

It's a weird one though isn't it. He sort of fouled him on the turn. If they're red card offences then there'd be red cards all the time. It's different to the unusual fouled when clean through. That said I don't think the appeal will be successful

red card for the last man not for the foul on the turn?

 

[Humpty]

It's a professional foul. Hugill is through on goal and Dijksteel has prevented a clear and obvious goalscoring opportunity. It's clumsy but it is a red card.

 

[Morton94]

He’s actually back in training!

Is he

 

[Lifelonfaninexile]

I feel we are creaking at the back as it is. No mention here of Smiths contribution after he came on. First thing he did was give the ball away which immediately lead to their goal Only other contribution of note was blaring a good chance into row z.

 

[InglebyUTB]

Not fussed anyway he simply isn't good enough

 

[asredastheycome]

If only darnell fisher was fit he would be ideal

Apart from a couple of games he was pretty average

 

[Jedi boro]

I always like a good draw.

 

[TheYorkshireTerrier]

Judging by the silence on this so far, we didn’t appeal.

 

[coluka]

Judging by the silence on this so far, we didn’t appeal.

I suspect we did. i heard Rick Parry has personally appointed a highly experienced 53 yr old former Premier League and current EFL referee to review the footage and uphold the original decision, I mean review the original decision shortly.

 

[Rofesleg]

If he had fouled him inside the box he would only have received a yellow card.

 

[newusername]

If he had fouled him inside the box he would only have received a yellow card.

Incorrect.

 

[junos_boots]

Incorrect.

As long as you are trying to win the ball in a tackle then last man foul in box is yellow. If ref thinks you made no effort to play the ball and just pulled man down then it is red

 

[wilkos_perm]

Incorrect.

No, it's correct

 

[Rofesleg]

Incorrect.

It was a law introduced a few seasons ago.
If a foul inside the box denies a clear goalscoring opportunity, then a penalty and yellow card is deemed sufficient punishment.
(Unless, as junos_boots pointed out, the ref thinks there was no genuine attempt to win the ball. Then it is a red card.)

Outside the box the punishment is a free kick and a red card.

 

[newusername]

As long as you are trying to win the ball in a tackle then last man foul in box is yellow.

He didn't though.

If ref thinks you made no effort to play the ball and just pulled man down then it is red

Exactly.

 

[newusername]

It was a law introduced a few seasons ago.
If a foul inside the box denies a clear goalscoring opportunity, then a penalty and yellow card is deemed sufficient punishment.
(Unless, as junos_boots pointed out, the ref thinks there was no genuine attempt to win the ball. Then it is a red card.)

Outside the box the punishment is a free kick and a red card.

Yes, the Law says:
... if the offence was an attempt to play the ball; in all other circumstances (e.g. holding, pulling, pushing, no possibility to play the ball etc.) the offending player must be sent off.

He pulled him down.

 

[Rofesleg]

Yes, the Law says:
... if the offence was an attempt to play the ball; in all other circumstances (e.g. holding, pulling, pushing, no possibility to play the ball etc.) the offending player must be sent off.

He pulled him down.

Thats the subjective bit.
I think he was attempting to win the ball but was very clumsy.
It would depend on how the ref viewed it. In saying that, knowing Stroud, he probably actually sent him off for using offensive language or something.