Benn Eubank off?

Just said on Talksport that it was ON.

Both fighters have spoke to each other and agreed to continue with the fight.

Bit confused, is it on or off?
 
Can see them finding any way of getting this fight on, despite the BBBOC's statement, surely too much money/hassle in it to cancel? Seem to remember Haye/Chisora being licensed under a foreign boxing board a few years back, so could happen again?
 
There might be a few phone calls to the Liechtenstein board of boxing control? Or cant they do that any more?
 
joeychicago said:
Can see them finding any way of getting this fight on, despite the BBBOC's statement, surely too much money/hassle in it to cancel? Seem to remember Haye/Chisora being licensed under a foreign boxing board a few years back, so could happen again?
Click to expand...
That’s an option I think it was Luxembourg - wouldn’t be such a good look if something were to happen!! However since when has boxing been concerned by it’s image!!
 
Apparently BBBoC don't acknowledge VADA only UKAD, Hearn is arguing that if they don't acknowledge VADA, they cant suspend him.
 
supermfc said:
Apparently BBBoC don't acknowledge VADA only UKAD, Hearn is arguing that if they don't acknowledge VADA, they cant suspend him.
Click to expand...
I think that’s true and so Hearns question is if he’s not suspended why can’t the fight go ahead - and if he’s not suspended what are the time frames for banning a non suspended fighter from fighting (if that makes sense)
 
FatCat said:
I think that’s true and so Hearns question is if he’s not suspended why can’t the fight go ahead - and if he’s not suspended what are the time frames for banning a non suspended fighter from fighting (if that makes sense)
Click to expand...
Maybe that is why the wording is such as it is?
‘not in the best interests of boxing’ but not necessarily breaking any UKAD rule. I’m clutching at straws like cos if he is clean accordingly to UKAD then they don’t seem to have much right to call it off.
 
Doom_On_Horseback said:
Maybe that is why the wording is such as it is?
‘not in the best interests of boxing’ but not necessarily breaking any UKAD rule. I’m clutching at straws like cos if he is clean accordingly to UKAD then they don’t seem to have much right to call it off.
Click to expand...
I’ve got a ticket - I’m a bit indifferent! No worries either way!
 
Is it PPV. Can't see sky virgin or BT pushing a fight on ppv when one fighter fails a drug test.
 
So apparently they've known about this since August/Early September but Hearn is saying it's too late to test the B sample, absolute nonsense of a sport :ROFLMAO:
 
I wonder what Hearn would have to say if Eubank took a beating and heaven forbid ended up seriously injured?

The fight should be called off, someone needs to make an adult decision.
 
I think they did announce the other day that virgin would offer it! That was when Hearn was promising 1 mill PPV!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top