Where did that happen then ? Who mentioned Germany ? Who mentioned starting wars ?@fmttmadmin not being funny but the amount of threads your coming on telling people to behave for nothing, yet here we have someone trying to imply the EU (more specifically Germany) is starting wars again.
You don't
You included a picture of WWII German soldiers smashing down a door, so I'd say you did.
No, that was comparing (albeit tongue in cheek) the behaviour of the EU with the behaviour of Nazi's with their "raid" on the AZ facility.
That's possibly the weakest defence for using Nazi imagery I've ever heard. Not to mention its ridiculously over the top. A little hint for you: believe what you read in the Telegraph by all means, but mentally tone down the overblown emotive language. The paper is a raging propaganda machine for the government so you need to have your pinches of salt ready
Perhaps you should also heed your own advice when it comes to toning down. After all the abusive name you were calling all Brexit voters on here.
Is there not rules around the reasons for a spot check? To check that your supplier is not lieing to you - is that a valid reason? I could imagine for quality control and process purposes you could do a spot check but do the rules really extend as far as you are suggesting?
I disgaree you really need to defend you use of nazi imagery in this case. Also falling for over the top and emotive language.
Not so much. The regulatory agencies can have an inspection at any time. They usually say why but confirming the supply of this vaccine can be managed properly is relevant.
I think it's pretty much self explanatory. I could change it to Stazi imagery or FSB imagery or MSS ..etc.etc. if you would prefer but the point is the same.
That's the point you're missing. You're taking the over the top, ridiculous emotive propaganda language of the Telegraph and expanding on it.
