r00fie1
Well-known member
No ambiguity.That's rude r00fie1.
No ambiguity.That's rude r00fie1.
This would make sense if Starmer's crew hadn't actively worked to lose two general elections, so wedded to the ideology that they were.Everyone wants something slightly different from their political party, that's life. Get behind the ideology that's its better for the country and stop back stabbing the best chance we have right now off getting rid of the tories.
And that is absoloutely your choice BBG, I don't have a problem with that. However, most other votes are generally wasted, and rightly or wrongly it tends to come down to do you want tory or labour rule.This would make sense if Starmer's crew hadn't actively worked to lose two general elections, so wedded to the ideology that they were.
I for one will never vote Labour with that man in charge. A man in the pockets of Zionists and who is throwing left wing jews out of the party is not getting my vote.
Well the main difference between being one or the other will be the amount of abuse you get on here.Labour.
Tory
Not sure what the difference is really.
Well one party has been in Government for 11 years and the other hasn't.Well the main difference between being one or the other will be the amount of abuse you get on here.
Tories always claiming they're victims with not a tear for the poor souls in foodbank queues growing year by year under their watch.Well one party has been in Government for 11 years and the other hasn't.
One party has presided over the most brutal period of austerity telling the nation that the other party would spend money we haven't got but they themselves then found the most magical money tree ever.
One party promised to maintain our armed forces then set about dismantling them.
One party criminally underfunded the NHS which came home to roost with the onset of the pandemic. 4.7m operations are currently delayed.
One party reduced the number of police officers by 20,000 then made a great deal of its announcement to increase police numbers by yes, you've guessed it, 20,000.
One party whipped its MPs into voting against a broader inquiry into the Cameron/Greensill lobbying scandal.
And therein lies the problem, the main one being dishonesty. If you can't see the lie in your statement you're either dumb or just plain dishonest.Labour.
Tory
Not sure what the difference is really.
Within one year of his leadership he has dropped all ten of his pledges to the voters so you must question either his competence or his honesty.for me Starmer, even if its just on the basis of competence and honesty, is an infinitely better choice than Johnson,
Well, there is an alternative to all this, at the next election kick Labour out and vote for a Boris Johnson Conservative governmentWithin one year of his leadership he has dropped all ten of his pledges to the voters so you must question either his competence or his honesty.
What are his policies?And therein lies the problem, the main one being dishonesty. If you can't see the lie in your statement you're either dumb or just plain dishonest.
There is acres of space between Johnson and starmer. You may not like some of his policies, you may just not like him but to equate him to Johnson is clearly nonsense.
Well it looks like PR is being backed by starmer for a startWhat are his policies?