The teaching assistants are more at risk than the teachers in tge schools o know, they are having closer contact with the kids than the teachers, I take your point though about 1 day per week.Its very hard to define job status. If someone says all teachers does that include a 25 yr old teacher assistant who might only be in 1 afternoon a week, a head master who has no contact with children, play ground assistants, dinner nannies (are they still called that?) etc. It would be very hard to define and could lead to delays and internal arguments. Leave it as age group, no body can argue over a birth certificate.
The point BillyBoyStu was making is that from a bald job title like "teacher", you don't know if someone is a head teacher with minimal forward facing duties, or a teaching assistant being in close contact with 28 different kids every hour for 6 hours a day. If you take time to start figuring out who does what, then you waste time. The (predominantly) age based program automatically prioritises those most at risk.The teaching assistants are more at risk than the teachers in tge schools o know, they are having closer contact with the kids than the teachers, I take your point though about 1 day per week.
They are making a decent job of it in my opinion with the exception of those with disabilities who were getting forgotten.
Not a clue to be honest, we were just told we could book in, completely contradicts the guidance but I guess they have managed to swing the essential workers line even though we’re barely that.Just a question JM14 do you know why you are getting yours now being in your 20s. Seems strange and hopefully not the norm. Don't agree with singling out Police and Teachers because there is lots of other occupations equally deserving and at similar risks. As I said on last post I think the Gorvernment have it pretty much right on this roll out.