Heam44
Well-known member
My honest opinion is I don’t have a clue what happened.
I’m inclined to say that there was nothing untoward about it on USA’s behalf (I.e they weren’t aware of it and certainly had no involvement in planning it etc).
The one thing I do find a bit suspicious about it is the buildings coming down as they did. I wouldn’t be hugely surprised if once it had happened bombs were strategically placed to bring the buildings down as they did so as to minimise further casualties by the buildings ‘falling over’ so to speak. Which to me would be understandable.
Although I did once read a very good / explanation as to why the buildings came down as they did, although I have absolutely no knowledge / very little understanding as to how plausible that explanation was.
What do people think??
I’m inclined to say that there was nothing untoward about it on USA’s behalf (I.e they weren’t aware of it and certainly had no involvement in planning it etc).
The one thing I do find a bit suspicious about it is the buildings coming down as they did. I wouldn’t be hugely surprised if once it had happened bombs were strategically placed to bring the buildings down as they did so as to minimise further casualties by the buildings ‘falling over’ so to speak. Which to me would be understandable.
Although I did once read a very good / explanation as to why the buildings came down as they did, although I have absolutely no knowledge / very little understanding as to how plausible that explanation was.
What do people think??