The department of education's approach to this has been shambolic. It is the government's job to come up with solutions to difficult problems. Once again absolute incompetence won the day. There was a huge disparity of approach between schools.
For example, my daughter gets her GCSE results this week. She sat mock exams in December. She then sat a series of 'GCSEs' in April and May under strict exam conditions. These were papers that were removed freom the internet past papers sites - they were therefore effectively unseen. As close to a proper exam as it was possible to get. However, the exam timetable was compressed hugely across a couple of weeks such that she was sometimes having three exams in one day, which simply would not happen with a proper GCSE timetable. Most of her final year and a half was spent in and out of lockdown. Areas of the syllabus were untaught and she had to do the work herself. The amount of pressure she put herself under was visibly doing her harm. Her results this Thursday will be based on the exam 'results'. Compare that to some other shcools who decided not to do any exams and instead grades will be entirely based on teacher assessment. I don't have a particular problem with either approach (with sensible timetabling and access to lessons) but there has to be consistency across all students. It is that disparity which seems grossly unfair to me.