William assaulted Harry...

All those 'nothing to see here' people on this thread...when was the last time you had an actual physical fight with your adult sibling?
 
El Guapo said:
I’m probably not the only one here who couldn’t give a shiiiit. Media whores H&M, nothing more - can’t cope with their own irrelevance.
Click to expand...
Clearly they are not that irrelevant if you have felt a need to comment on them, huh?
 
El Guapo said:
How did I know that would be the response? I mean, brothers fight, families argue, it’s everyday life and they can’t cope with it without spouting to the world. They and their family squabbles are as irrelevant as you and I to the wider world.
Click to expand...
No. It is not normal for adult siblings to be violent to each other. 'Brothers fight' might work when they are toddlers, it does not work when they are both 30+ adults.
 
El Guapo said:
How did I know that would be the response? I mean, brothers fight, families argue, it’s everyday life and they can’t cope with it without spouting to the world. They and their family squabbles are as irrelevant as you and I to the wider world.
Click to expand...
Adult brothers having a dust up is not 'everyday life', hence why this is news. And in any case, the whole point of the Royals is supposed to be that they are elevated above 'normal' status.
 
BoroMart said:
It's a sign of emotional immaturity for a 37 year old to behave like that, but then I would suspect it's fairly natural for someone who has spent his whole life thinking he is special to behave in such a way. Monarchs have been known for violent outburst throughout the centuries. They are used to getting their own way and not being challenged.
Click to expand...
You only have to look at the issue King John caused Robin Hood when King Richard was off fighting the crusades. 🤣 🤣 🤣

1672926014873.png
 
FabioPorkpie said:
Except it’s a matter of public record that Jason Knauf provided evidence in the copyright lawsuit between (Meghan and the Mail on Sunday). He did so on behalf of ANL, publisher of the Mail on Sunday, while he was the chief executive of William and Kate’s Royal Foundation.
It doesn’t take a gigantic leap of faith to come to the conclusion that it is likely that William would have been aware that one of his key aides was about to give evidence against his brother’s wife on behalf of the gutter press. Nor is it a stretch to think that he would have been unable to proceed in giving eveidence without William’s approval.

It should not be forgotten that Meghan was successful in her lawsuit.
Further, an appeals court rejected a bid by the Mail on Sunday to take it to a trial.

Anyway, the point I am making is just that William has not been the silent innocent party in any of this. He’s just been more crafty, devious and less transparent in his role in the feud.

Completely unrelated…Jason Knauf has just been made a Lieutenant of the Royal Victorian Order in the New Years Honours. This is an honour ‘in the Kings gift’ that is bestowed upon individuals independently of Downing Street.
Click to expand...
Don't you hate it when facts are used to debunk conspiracies and undermine personal prejudices.....no, I bloody love it.

William is the royal equivalent of Gaston Ramirez, a Machiavellian snake, who can't keep his schlong in his pants
 
changingman said:
My view on this is the same as any other story involving the monarchy - if it precipitates the break up of the Royal Family = good. Otherwise, irrelevant.
Click to expand...
Eventually Middleton will turn, there's no way she's going to put up with all this stuff for 50 more years. They'll be hanging by a thread when that happens, and suddenly everyone is a 'media whore' except Charles/Camilla and William.
 
Last edited:
Randy said:
You seriously think rough around the edges, ex squaddie Harry didn't give his brother a clip back?

Come on now.
Click to expand...
I reckon he could have sparked him out, if he wanted to. Maybe he's got a bit more class about him than to attack his brother as an adult though
 
El Guapo said:
I’m probably not the only one here who couldn’t give a shiiiit. Media whores H&M, nothing more - can’t cope with their own irrelevance.
Click to expand...
But if they are media whores what does that make William, and Kate and Charles and Elizabeth before? In the papers and on TV every bloody day. Even cosplaying their children as edwardians so that they can have them on TV wishing merry christmas to people they have no intention of meeting. the idea of being Team William purely because you think Harry & Meghan are media-whores is ignoring the fact that royalty only perpetuates by them all being media whores.
 
Wasn't really a fight was it? "Willy" (FFS) grabbed his collar and "necklace" (again FFS) and pushed him to the floor. Not something I'd expect most grown adults to do, but sounds a lot like handbags (although I'm assuming Harry's handbag was out of reach at the time).

I bet it was both pathetic and hilarious.

As if some people enjoy bowing and scraping to these clowns. Each to their own.
 
festa5 said:
Wasn't really a fight was it? "Willy" (FFS) grabbed his collar and "necklace" (again FFS) and pushed him to the floor. Not something I'd expect most grown adults to do, but sounds a lot like handbags (although I'm assuming Harry's handbag was out of reach at the time).

I bet it was both pathetic and hilarious.

As if some people enjoy bowing and scraping to these clowns. Each to their own.
Click to expand...
There is absolutely no doubt that whatever happened was hilarious. I wish Meghan had been there to film it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top