Jostler
Well-known member
It wasn’t aimed at you artie! I agree with your pints!No, very grateful for the MMR. Cannot fathom how you drew your conclusion based on my post
edit points!
It wasn’t aimed at you artie! I agree with your pints!No, very grateful for the MMR. Cannot fathom how you drew your conclusion based on my post
I would question the subjective opinion of an individual who was part of a team of other virologists and epidemiologists whose opinions differ greatlySo would you doubt the opinions of the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology ? Seiously, just look at his reaction to that FOIA data on lipids (at 2:16:00 or so) and tell me you don't believe him.
Apologies jostler, I must have misinterpreted your post and replied to the wrong one!It wasn’t aimed at you artie! I agree with your pints!
edit points!
NP I replied to smog, not you so not sure if that’s showing up differently on you mob/laptopApologies jostler, I must have misinterpreted your post!
It's operator error on my side, apologiesNP I replied to smog, not you so not sure if that’s showing up differently on you mob/laptop
Fair enough, can you critique the data then ?I would question the subjective opinion of an individual who was part of a team of other virologists and epidemiologists whose opinions differ greatly
No, very grateful for the MMR. Cannot fathom how you drew your conclusion based on my post
I know, as mentioned above, I mixed posts up and misread/replied to the wrong postJostler wasn't replying to you. Pretty sure you two folks are on the same side.
I will have a listen.FFS Bret Weinstein??
You should probably have a listen to this @smogontherhine.
I’ve not watched your video but the fact it is by Bret Weinstein rings massive, massive alarm bells.
He has a track record of selectively portraying information to suit his agenda and sucking people in.
Steve Kirsch. Big antivax.
These people are not the good honest guys just trying to help out the little guys, that you think they are.
SIO291: Bret Weinstein Spreads Dangerous Anti-vax Nonsense
Joe Rogan said healthy, young people shouldn't get the COVID vaccine. This is dangerous and anti-science and incorrect. Though Rogan apologized, Heather Heying and Bret Weinstein took to their YouTube channel to double down on Rogan's claims and do further damage to the cause of science and the...play.acast.com
It would be good if it was like bottles pfI have listened to all 3 hours and at no point did either of the 3 blokes ever say, and we know on this board how vital the information is, what colour these vaccines are. They clearly can’t be serious epidemiologists.
They’d have to do a yellow for Scotland to keep wee Jimmy Krankie happy and two shades of green for our Irish brothers and sistersIt would be good if it was like bottles pf
Aftershock in Frescos, where you could pick a bottle of red or blue!
I will have a listen.
But in the now common practice of ad-hominen attacks I'd be right to ask who is Thomas Smith and why should I believe him over an evolutionary biologist and the inventor of the mRNA vaccine.
.... has a lot of interesting things to say about it.
If you have 3 hours and an open mind you might want to watch this, make of it what you will, if you think they're misinformed nutjobs, that's your perogative ....
If you haven't got 3 hours just listen to what they say about where the lipids end up at 2:16 or so and what the US FDA are worried about.
Thanks for taking the time!I watched from 2hr16, the section about bio distribution of lipid nanoparticle components after vaccination.
To summarize what I saw - COVID vaccines use a variety of lipids to help deliver mRNA to cells. The video shows data compiled from Pfizer examines the concentration of lipids in animals up to 48 hours after they receive a COVID vaccination. The data shows that the concentration of these lipids increases significantly in many tissues, including the bone marrow and ovaries, after vaccination. It is incredibly important to understand that these data come from experiments conducted in rats and mice, and the animals received up to 500x the weight matched dose that humans receive. Despite this, no toxicity was observed. You can read the findings for yourself of course, because none of this was really kept a secret. The European medicines association published this (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/docume...omirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf) back in February.
Excellent post which, in a nutshell, shows how these con artists operate, misrepresenting available data to paint an untrue picture to push an agenda. They rely on the fact a tiny minority will actually follow up research. Most will see their video and take it as read, and then forward it on.I watched from 2hr16, the section about bio distribution of lipid nanoparticle components after vaccination.
To summarize what I saw - COVID vaccines use a variety of lipids to help deliver mRNA to cells. The video shows data compiled from Pfizer examines the concentration of lipids in animals up to 48 hours after they receive a COVID vaccination. The data shows that the concentration of these lipids increases significantly in many tissues, including the bone marrow and ovaries, after vaccination. It is incredibly important to understand that these data come from experiments conducted in rats and mice, and the animals received up to 500x the weight matched dose that humans receive. Despite this, no toxicity was observed. You can read the findings for yourself of course, because none of this was really kept a secret. The European medicines association published this (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/docume...omirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf) back in February.
Thanks for this link, I did read the report that was acquired under FOIA (at least the part that was not in Japanese)... I didn't know it was already out there... Will check your link.Thanks for taking the time!