Are you honestly saying that you've never known a politician to lie?
Is that your argument, politicians lie occassionally? Have you ever known a reporter to lie?
The evidence says that Starmer did not threaten Lidsey Hoyle. Both the alleged victim and the perpetrator said it didn't happen. Look to see if you can find any evidence supported by the BBC, Watt's employer. There isn't any. All this completely ignores the fact that Starmer, probably, wouldn't have threatened hoyle in front of anyone else, nor made it public that was what he was going to do.
Your supposition would have us believe that the former head of the CPS committed a crime.
As for my admiration of Starmer, I don't even like him and have said so on numerous occassions. I just don't approach every political event like a child looking for a reason to castigate Starmer.
It doesn't matter which statement from Hoyle I believe, neither supports your point of view.
For a bunch of folks who wanted a ceasefire called for, you don't seem very happy that we have that motion, now passed. You seem much more incensed with Starmer. You might forgive me for thinking the ceasefire isn't centermost in your mind.
For my part I am happy that the UK parliament has a formal position on a ceasefire in gazza that doesn't crap all over international law. Not sure what position the Starmer haters are taking on this, mainly because it has been lost entirely in the rush to ridicule Starmer.
You can carry on without me from here on in. I find the attitudes a little unedifying.