probably the most obvious post this week ....I followed updates on CNN web-site. Daniels came across as rather unreliable and a bit of a gold-digger.
Sure that isn't a description of Trump?I followed updates on CNN web-site. Daniels came across as rather unreliable and a bit of a gold-digger.
It really doesn't matter if she is or isn't. Stormy could have claimed that Trump flew her to the moon and they had a threesome with a sexy alien, the whole point of the case is to prove that Trump illegally used campaign funds to cover up a story that would have affected him being elected president.I followed updates on CNN web-site. Daniels came across as rather unreliable and a bit of a gold-digger.
Yes but he's claiming the money was paid by mistake & then covered up by Michael Cohen, so he didn't ask for it to be paid to keep her quiet or have anything to do with the cover up. If he can create doubt that she's telling the truth they had sex and that she's only doing this for the money/notoriety, then that supports his defence.It really doesn't matter if she is or isn't. Stormy could have claimed that Trump flew her to the moon and they had a threesome with a sexy alien, the whole point of the case is to prove that Trump illegally used campaign funds to cover up a story that would have affected him being elected president.
It doesn't matter WHAT he paid the hush money for. Discrediting Daniels does absolutely nothing to help Trump legally, it's all about feeding his ego.
Which is why the prosecution yesterday was providing evidence that Trump is a micromanager to the nth degree, and there is no way Cohen would have acted on his own accord.Yes but he's claiming the money was paid by mistake & then covered up by Michael Cohen, so he didn't ask for it to be paid to keep her quiet or have anything to do with the cover up. If he can create doubt that she's telling the truth they had sex and that she's only doing this for the money/notoriety, then that supports his defence.