BoroMart
Well-known member
every dog has his day, it's about consistency and he definitely isn't consistentReach was quality today v Cardiff , with pace , skill and 2 goals . Not chunky either
every dog has his day, it's about consistency and he definitely isn't consistentReach was quality today v Cardiff , with pace , skill and 2 goals . Not chunky either
Didn’t Bennett jumpFor example we could have a left side of Joe Bennett and Adam Reach
Didn’t Bennett jump
At the first opportunity as soon as villa came in for him.
Hello mate, I answered you before stating that my surname is Wyke. Charlie's dad and I are cousins.Norman, I asked you this before but you might not have seen it. How are you related to Charlie Wyke?
Met Ged many times over the years. Great bloke and a good laugh. As for Charlie after watching his career i think he would end up another Jordan Hugill if he came here.Hello mate, I answered you before stating that my surname is Wyke. Charlie's dad and I are cousins.
Any particular reason.
Cool, no reason, just curious.Hello mate, I answered you before stating that my surname is Wyke. Charlie's dad and I are cousins.
Any particular reason.
Definitely. Could never understand why we sold Reach. I get we went up but that lad think his name was Fischer? What did he bring to the table that Reach didnt. Exactly what we need. Better than Marvin Johnson imho although i like Johnsons tenacity, Reach can cross and scores a few. Would be genuinely excited by Wyke. Think he got a couple of cameos under Mowbray. Again why did we sell?Normally I am not one for resigning players . But needs must. Wyke and Reach, to me would improve us in the goal scoring area. Jones? Mmmmm, a lot of resentment against him for past misdemeanours. Is he a better option than the wide options?
Probably very debatable.
Reach - he'd lost his place in the second half of the season 2014-15 to Bamford, we then signed Stuani and Downing that closed season and Wednesday offered £7M so it was a no brainer.Definitely. Could never understand why we sold Reach. I get we went up but that lad think his name was Fischer? What did he bring to the table that Reach didnt. Exactly what we need. Better than Marvin Johnson imho although i like Johnsons tenacity, Reach can cross and scores a few. Would be genuinely excited by Wyke. Think he got a couple of cameos under Mowbray. Again why did we sell?
Disagree. Reach was / is a good player. Would suggest he wpuld have offered more than Downing did second time round had we kept him. I get Wyke wasnt in the first time but, club have been a bit short sighted with letting certain players go imho. Wyke, Graham, Reach for exampleReach - he'd lost his place in the second half of the season 2014-15 to Bamford, we then signed Stuani and Downing that closed season and Wednesday offered £7M so it was a no brainer.
Wyke - never got anywhere near the first team. Has not been prolific until this season. You can hardly say why did we let him go 6 years ago and then it take 5 seasons before he looks like someone who might be useful in our team. He wouldn't have played for us and has probably needed those seasons at Carlisle, Bradford and two at Sunderland before getting this level of experience and confidence.
I don't think it would have been fair to keep Charlie sat about watching from the wings and I don't think he would have been happy to do it. He had to move on to learn his trade and I am sure he is a better player for the bumps and bruises he's taken along the way. He's played under some decent managers who had decent football careers and he must have learnt a thing or two from them and their coaching staff.Disagree. Reach was / is a good player. Would suggest he wpuld have offered more than Downing did second time round had we kept him. I get Wyke wasnt in the first time but, club have been a bit short sighted with letting certain players go imho. Wyke, Graham, Reach for example
We sold reach for way above his market value at the time, was it about 5-7mill. He was probably worth about 2.5 when we sold him. We got a good deal, he was a squad player at the time, it was the right move for everyone. Despite his long range highlights real, he never ever had bigger clubs, prem clubs, scrambling to sign him. Deep down we all know that that's because he is absolutely averageDisagree. Reach was / is a good player. Would suggest he wpuld have offered more than Downing did second time round had we kept him. I get Wyke wasnt in the first time but, club have been a bit short sighted with letting certain players go imho. Wyke, Graham, Reach for example
Yet we’re all saying he’d be a good addition to the squad? Would suggest that a squad with players such as Reach and others of his ilk would have depth and quality that we havent had for years. The Forshaw’s, Nugent’s, not players that broke the bank. Just shortsighted from the club. We got 5 million for him. Ok, with Gestede, Britt, Johnson, the Pulis garbage, the five million profit on Reach has turned into lasting defecit by investing in drossWe sold reach for way above his market value at the time, was it about 5-7mill. He was probably worth about 2.5 when we sold him. We got a good deal, he was a squad player at the time, it was the right move for everyone. Despite his long range highlights real, he never ever had bigger clubs, prem clubs, scrambling to sign him. Deep down we all know that that's because he is absolutely average