I think we understand your opinion by now.
Question for you. Why do you think Carrick hasn’t selected him?
You can’t say he has made a mistake, as you’ve no idea how Barlaser would have performed if started.
We didn’t fail against Cov purely because Mowatt played.
Barlaser might go on to be what you think he is. I hope so.
Honestly... And this is totally opinion, I'm not Carrick's confidant but I can't shake the worry that he has gotten risk adverse.
Someone referenced 'Getting over ran because full backs bomb on if we play Barlaser' ... Does Tommy Smith Bomb on?
We have a very nice system in offense we switch to a back 3 and defence back to a 4. It fights the counter fairly efficiently for the advantage of potent attacks.
Barlaser for sure can do that role (as in being the guy who comes into the back 3 on attack) as can Hackney.
So why Mowatt? Jitters plain and simple, the belief that he's more 'solid' (From Carrick), the exact same thing can be seen with Gareth Southgate a man that as a person I find a very decent human being.
The issue then with Mowatt is he slows play down and isn't a natural creative player.
Our attacking play clearly suffered, ironically our possession stats show the change. We start having the ball much more because we're playing without pace and penetration.
So that's my take, that's why he played Mowatt in my opinion.