newyddion
Well-known member
clam down dear!I phukking hope you are you sad sack.
clam down dear!I phukking hope you are you sad sack.
It shows that it's "just a job" for some players. I'd probably take 40k a week to do absolutely nothing but train if I was him too.
If I had the chance (and the ability) I would play for my expenses. Sporting glory and all that.Of course his priority is money - it would be the same for every one of us!
If he can't get a game for Newcastle, who have poor or constantly injured strikers, then he's not likely to get a game for another Prem Team, and no other Prem Team would give him the same wages, or a contract longer than two years. He's not in the same position as when he extended that last contract a year ago.This would make sense of he was at someone like Man City and could go to somewhere like Spurs/Everton/Newcastle but Gayle is a player who isn't going to enhance his reputation by playing well for Boro. He's already regarded as a player that is a very good championship player but not quite good enough so if he goes anywhere it'll be somewhere that either pays him what he's on now or gives him the chance to prove that he is a PL quality player. He's not going to earn another big move in the future, he's too old.
He's got very little to gain by taking a paycut to play championship football.
If he can't get a game for Newcastle, who have poor or constantly injured strikers, then he's not likely to get a game for another Prem Team, and no other Prem Team would give him the same wages, or a contract longer than two years. He's not in the same position as when he extended that last contract a year ago.
He's guaranteed £4m at Newcastle over the next two years, which will be hard to get him away from, but he may take £1m a year for two years from some champo club, plus Newcastle pay £1m for him to go and a £1m signing on fee. That would work out the same for Gayle and he gets to play (which I assume he wants to do) and could even have an automatic extension at year 3 and 4 if he plays a certain amount of games (which he would get if he's scoring 10-20 a season). It almost guarantees him a game/ wage in 3 years time at a good level, which could unlock the door on some other opportunities like a move abroad etc. This only applies if he still think's he'll be able to play that level mind, but if he doesn't he'll stay at the Mags until they pay him off to leave.
If he spends 2 years on the bench he would be in a worse position come year 3, and he might think he could play to 36 or more.
Champions league, UEFA cup, and Premier league winner Ross Turnbull?Remember when Chelsea signed the Boro keeper forgot his name? The young lad.
Uefa super cup, cup world cup, and Premier league winner Andy Lonergan?Also Liverpool bought our 3rd or 4th choice keeper a couple of years ago. As well as Brad Jones
That’s themChampions league, UEFA cup, and Premier league winner Ross Turnbull?
Uefa super cup, cup world cup, and Premier league winner Andy Lonergan?
Yeah, he might not do, so might just take the 4m and put his feet up, or he might think he cold drop down and re-prove himself at that level, and try and squeeze out more cash in total.Maybe he doesn't have the confidence in his own ability, he hasn't played proper football for 2 years(?).
If he was full of confidence, and convinced he's going to drop down a league and bang the goals in - your post makes total sense, he'll be better off.
However, if he leaves Newcastle and comes to the championship on a 1 year 20k/week contract and flops... There's the potential he could lose £2-3 million, because even if he stays at Newcastle until his contract runs out, "someone" will still end up signing him afterwards anyway.
Its abhorrent to give credence to the idea that a footballers life is short, implying they deserve ridiculous salaries to "provide" for their future.professional pride is something you might have when you're in a career spanning 40-50 years with a steady retirement pot. Probably fairly rare in an Industry where 99% of peoples earnings stop abruptly when they hit 35 or so and over 40% declare bankruptcy within 5 years.
Yeah they earn eye watering amounts but their lifestyle doesn't change because they've retired and they will have wives, girlfriends and families to provide for, sometimes for the next 50-60 years and any income post playing is likely to be chicken feed
Playing a few extra games of footy and appeasing fans of a club you have no connection with yet probably features pretty low on his priority list compared to providing the best possible future for his kids, partner and himself
I wonder how much they are paying him?
But they aren't lads at British steel, or normal families using a foodbank, it's a bizarre comparison to make. He has a much higher earning potential and that isn't his fault, and doesn't mean he should take a huge pay cut because others don't have that same opportunity. They're lads that come into a great deal of money and often manage ur badly and go broke as a result of that money drying up.Its abhorrent to give credence to the idea that a footballers life is short, implying they deserve ridiculous salaries to "provide" for their future.
The lads at British Steel Redcar found that their career was short too, as do millions of ordinary families and low paid workers in our country.
But no one is bleating for them.
The likes of Gayle may have to adapt their "lifestyle", but thats of no consequence - when normal families are attending foodbanks and people are being chucked on the dole.
No sympathy whatsoever with this "short career" nonsense.
[btw "ThatFragranceGuy" - my response is about the idea that footballers deserve huge salaries because their careers are short.
Nothing personal to you]
Its exactly because they are one of the privileged few that I have no sympathy whatsoever if they have to survive on a few £Million(s)But they aren't lads at British steel, or normal families using a foodbank, it's a bizarre comparison to make. He has a much higher earning potential and that isn't his fault, and doesn't mean he should take a huge pay cut because others don't have that same opportunity. They're lads that come into a great deal of money and often manage ur badly and go broke as a result of that money drying up.
No one says the deserve the salaries they get, but they do get them and those salaries find their lifestyle and the future of their children and it's a nonsense that anyone says they would miss out on a few million to go play for a club they have no affinity towards, rather than earning that cash and having it for their families security and their future life.
I don’t think he is either, and we shouldn’t even be considered that kind of outlay as a championship club - been down that road before and paid the price heavily for itI think hes a good player but I'm not sure he's as good as people are making him out to be. Last season was his best season by a long way and I think he was fortunate with a lot of his goals. The ones against blackpool, us, fulham (h & a), bristol city (h & a) all carried a lot of luck. Maybe I'm being hard on the lad but I dont see him as a £12m plus player.
Does it rhyme with 'crockeries'?Vic-Ter Guy-Cor-Ree-Key?
or is it
Vic-Tor Gee-Yor-Ker-Res?
Champions league, UEFA cup, and Premier league winner Ross Turnbull?
Uefa super cup, cup world cup, and Premier league winner Andy Lonergan?
I can see Bettinelli doing something similar.
Sky saying free transfer, I wonder if we were offered that?