Variant of concern in South Africa

Well I had it a number of years.. Became ill even ending up in hospital.

I stopped then and was fine.

I then took it again 2 years ago and again ill catching every bug around.

So yeah, I think im more than capable of making my own decision on this.

I had the flu, having had the jab so it didn't really help.

Thanks for your concern though.
Ah apologies. I read the first sentence here as one instance of you getting the flu vaccine and being ill
 
Are we thinking some form of restrictions leading up to Christmas then, with the government stating they are determined to act quickly this time and Whitty saying we must be more ‘muscular’ against new variants?
 
Relax. We've had freedom day, everyone is back at work and in the pub and nobody wears masks any more. Nothing can go wrong. Bozza said so.
 
Relax. We've had freedom day, everyone is back at work and in the pub and nobody wears masks any more. Nothing can go wrong. Bozza said so.
Admit it you’re praying for another lockdown aren’t you?? If you came out from behind your settee and joined the real world you’d realise most of us have moved on and decided we can put up with a virus with a 99.8% survival rate
 
Must have been admin. Wasn't me.

I hear the government have put scotch egg makers on red alert and councils have been readied to tape up benches and kid's playgrounds.

Can't wait for another scotch egg moment. There will more calls for measures which completely failed previously. e.g. border closures.
 
We've been here before.....

South African case data.... Peaks on:

19th July 2020
11th Jan 2021
08th July 2021
next peak......?...... mid Jan 2022?

1637968584670.png
 
Admit it you’re praying for another lockdown aren’t you?? If you came out from behind your settee and joined the real world you’d realise most of us have moved on and decided we can put up with a virus with a 99.8% survival rate
Why do you think someone is praying for another lockdown simply because they are questioning how we've dealt with it previously. I''ll "come out from behind my settee" and join my real world, not yours. My wife worked on a covid ward for almost a year, working 12 hour shifts wearing masks that ****. can't be arsed to wear for 15 or so minutes while they are doing a bit of shopping. I've worked, as have lots of others delivering to people with covid. I've had my 2 jabs, caught covid, got over it and had my booster. We've all put up with restrictions on our movements and on our behaviour, which has restricted the spread of the virus, which is a major reason that along with the the vaccine is a reason so many less people are dying from it. We've relaxed every measure we took to drive down the impact of covid and look what's happening. You might be able to put up with a 99.8% survival rate, although I would love to see your provenance for that, but I would rather carry on wearing a mask, wash my hands regularly, socially distance where I can and have people working from home if they possibly can, than kill 2 people out of every thousand just so I could "move on". Jam69 may have put my reply rather more succinctly.
 
South Africa has something like a 25% vaccination rate which is probably why this variant has been able to mutate and spread. We need to be mindful of that and not be so dismissive of new variants just because we've been lucky enough to have wide access to vaccines.
If, and that's a big if, this turns out to be able to evade the vaccines then we'll need to be prepared to enforce measures again.
 
Admit it you’re praying for another lockdown aren’t you?? If you came out from behind your settee and joined the real world you’d realise most of us have moved on and decided we can put up with a virus with a 99.8% survival rate
Is it 99.8% though? That claim has been refuted many times. Here's just one example, from fullfact.org.

CoVid-19 survival rate is less than 99.8%

As it states:

As of 18 February there have been 129,498 deaths registered with Covid-19 recorded as a cause on the death certificate. This is about 0.19% of the entire UK population.

If only 0.2% of people die from Covid-19 after catching it (which the claimed 99.8% survival rate implies), then virtually everyone in the country must have already been infected. This is almost certainly not the case, because the disease is still spreading between susceptible people, more people are still dying, and population surveys have not shown high enough rates of infection.

Also, that's only for the UK. Worldwide, the survival rate is closer to 98.8%. That still may sound fairly high but you've also got to factor in the transmissiblity of the disease and the sheer number of people who are likely to get infected - especially since this new omicron variant is estimated to be several times more transmissible than even the delta variant was.

The population of the world is nearly 8 billion - even if only around 50% of the world's people end up getting CoVid-19 (and some scientists now think almost everyone will eventually get it, the way things are going) you're still talking about a total of over 45 million deaths.
 
Last edited:
Is it 99.8% though? That claim has been refuted many times. Here's just one example, from fullfact.org.

CoVid-19 survival rate is less than 99.8%

As it states:



Also, that's only for the UK. Worldwide, the survival rate is closer to 98.8%. That still may sound fairly high but you've also got to factor in the transmissiblity of the disease and the sheer number of people who are likely to get infected - especially since this new omicron variant is estimated to be several times more transmissible than even the delta variant was.

The population of the world is nearly 8 billion - even if only around 50% of the world's people end up getting CoVid-19 (and some scientists now think almost everyone will eventually get it, the way things are going) you're still talking about a total of over 45 million deaths.
That would be nearly 700k deaths in the uk assuming everybody eventually got infected. That's a lot.

It also allows for mutations which may eventually become more deadly.

Lock downs, whilst they don't effect me, I am married with kids and can work from home, and indeed have been for nearly 2 years. I realise for some they are emotionally and financially devastating

The government should have left simple measures in place and the decision not to was driven by a handful on idealogical grounds.

Hopefully this variant is no worse than delta and its not back to the start with vaccinations.
 
50,000 cases today. The new variant might well be here now causing the recent increase in cases. How log does it take to sequence it? A week? A few days?
They can detect it on the PCR, without it being sequenced I think, but they do sequence a hell of a lot of PCR's in the UK. That's how I have interpreted it anyway.
 
That would be nearly 700k deaths in the uk assuming everybody eventually got infected. That's a lot.

It also allows for mutations which may eventually become more deadly.

Lock downs, whilst they don't effect me, I am married with kids and can work from home, and indeed have been for nearly 2 years. I realise for some they are emotionally and financially devastating

The government should have left simple measures in place and the decision not to was driven by a handful on idealogical grounds.

Hopefully this variant is no worse than delta and its not back to the start with vaccinations.
The IFR from the UK studies was estimated a 1.1% last year, reliable study, good healthcare, large amount of infection, large amount of data. So 98.9% survival would be more accurate. Most others were in the 1-1.4% range, depending on various other factors and differing degrees of healthcare.

But, that 98.9% is for situations where healthcare is not overwhelmed, but no lockdowns = overwhelmed healthcare, so the IFR could have easily doubled for us. India had an estimated IFR of 4% in their April wave.

The mutation for Omicron is seemingly from Alpha lineage (pre-vaccines), but dates back over a year from when case 1 got the infection, but this was also in a country that had not started vaccine rollout.

I first read this from Francois Balloux, or got the link from him, and the other geneticists are thinking that it has come from an immuno compromised Aids carrier, who has basically had it for a year, and has mutated and mutated, which is why it has the 30 odd mutations. So this mutation has likely not been effected at all by vaccines, or vaccine evasion, it's came from someone before there was even vaccines available.

Delta was the same, they think this mutated prior to wide vaccine rollout where it was mutated. The mutations would happen regardless, the way I understand it.

Obviously early days on this, but there's some info here:


1638012219567.png

1638012900226.png
 
Lets hope that is the case and the mutations don't affect vaccines. 30 mutations is a lot, I would have thought though. Whilst the mutations may not have had the vaccine petri dish to mutate in, it is, as you say, early days.

Heres hoping.

Watching the WHO news conference, the guy presenting it, and his accent was strong, so it was a struggle, suggested that they were deciding whether it was a variant of concerrn. Listening to otherr news channels, they seem to be doom and gloom about this, sensationalising the ass out of it. They ma, of course, turn out to be right, but the WHO seem to be advocating a watching and monitoring brief at the moment.
 
Back
Top