Trump continues to MAGA

I see the Senate has just passed the Big Beautiful Bill thanks to Lisa Murkowski of Alaska folding under pressure.
You'd hope even the thickest Americans will see the harm this will do and vote the GOP out of power in the midterms.

Sadly, I think they might just stick with being partisan despite suffering
 
Zoophonic said:
You really have to pinch yourself that this Sh1t emanates on the official White House platform.

View attachment 92233
Click to expand...
At what point do the majority of Americans go ‘WTF is going on here ?’

Or has years of poor education and fox news propaganda rendered them incapable of making a coherent decision?

Do they not see that they’re now seen as a mafiosa / corrupt state with a government and Supreme Court judiciary of invertebrates
 
1 in 5 Americans are illiterate. In the modern world it's the dumbest country and by some way.

Furthermore their top spot in science has gone too with China surpassing them, despite the ridiculous amounts that they spend on research.
 
Laughing said:
1 in 5 Americans are illiterate. In the modern world it's the dumbest country and by some way.

Furthermore their top spot in science has gone too with China surpassing them, despite the ridiculous amounts that they spend on research.
Click to expand...
It is the sequel to Idiocracy but IRL. Has an empire ever fallen so quickly?
The western nations have to humour him for now but the ties are clearly breaking by the day.
 
Scrote said:
They will have opposed it for the same reason the left (and liberals) in the UK oppose it.

The responsibility for child access to pornography lies with parents. End of story.

Any law that relies on "won't you think of the children" is almost certainly (a) a bad law, and (b) a precursor for scope-creep into other civil liberties.
Click to expand...
Thin end of the wedge arguments are vacuous. If parents are supposed to be the sole arbiters of child protection issues, then the logic of that is that not only does the state have no right to interfere in the consumption of pornography it has no right to interfere in the participation in it. Excluding a few nut jobs in the 1980s, I don’t think anyone, anywhere, argues that.

So there is a line to be drawn, and it is where you draw it. And you draw it in the correct place. You do not draw it in the wrong place because you do not think you would have the courage to draw it in the right place next time if a different question came up.

Arguing that the first amendment should be read with a view to preserving the right of parents if they wish to let their kids see pornography is as preposterous as the most deranged arguments I have ever read about the second amendment.
 
FishofContemplation said:
Arguing that the first amendment should be read with a view to preserving the right of parents if they wish to let their kids see pornography is as preposterous as the most deranged arguments I have ever read about the second amendment
Click to expand...
If you can point to where anyone is arguing for that then I'll happily agree.

You know they aren't so why create the straw man? It just makes it look like any argument you do have must be extremely weak.
 
dooderooni said:
I see the Senate has just passed the Big Beautiful Bill thanks to Lisa Murkowski of Alaska folding under pressure.
You'd hope even the thickest Americans will see the harm this will do and vote the GOP out of power in the midterms.

Sadly, I think they might just stick with being partisan despite suffering
Click to expand...
IMG_3088.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top