motownjunk
Well-known member
It was cheesy, badly acted, predictable, one dimensional characters, dialog and script terrible. Having said all that I did quite enjoy it.
I thought the Val Kilmer scene was brilliantly done too
Wash your mouth out ! 49 (same age as me and you didn’t like the original ?!I seem to be one of the few my age(49) who didn't like the 1st TG, have to admit quite enjoyed new one, old fashioned action flick
He's my Kryptonite. I quite liked Vanilla Sky and Eyes Wide Shut, but I get a sick feeling in my mouth in pretty much everything else I've ever seen him in......never seen the first Top Gun, I refused to watch something that appeared so vapid, so obv haven't seen the second. If they could CGI him out of it and replace with Salma Hayek then I'd go and watch it on a 4DX screeningI have a unfounded and truly illogical dislike of Tom Cruise as an actor. When I have watched his films(Interview with a vampire, War of the worlds and Edge of tomorrow immediately spring to mind)I have actually enjoyed them and find him to be a rather versatile actor. But when I am looking for a film to watch and I see that Tom Cruise is in it my stubbornness and mind block kicks In and I skip to the next film.
I too really enjoyed it. One of the rare occasions that the sequel lives up to the original in terms of been as good if not better.the plan was always to watch it when it came out in the cinema but well things happened but today finally I saw it on the big screen ( last week at show case)
Wow I’ll echo what others said I loved it. a love letter to the original but still new enough to have the same wow impact as the original. The cinematography is stunning. That feeling of being in the cockpit was thrilling.
Lovely tribute to Tony Scott at the end.
Yes I enjoyed that ( better late than never).
It was worth the wait.
Yeah, but the flying scenes were a big part of the film so it's a bit daft saying the film wouldn't be as good without them.The flying scenes were amazing though. Without these it would have been a B movie.
Yeah, but the flying scenes were a big part of the film so it's a bit daft saying the film wouldn't be as good without them.
But I didn't actually call you daft did I Mr Sensitive?I meant the impressiveness of the flying scenes. As many have stated on here they are superb. If they had all being CGI and less edgy it would, in my opinion, been a terrible film.
But we all have opinions, especially on things like films. I love that you call me daft for giving my opinion on a thread about the film as your first contribution. You have really added to the thread. Good work. Keep it up
Yes Jurassic park would have been sht without the dinosaurs to be fairYeah, but the flying scenes were a big part of the film so it's a bit daft saying the film wouldn't be as good without them.